Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Worldbuilding is Bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3467748" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>LOL. Normally at this point in a thread's life, I'm inclined to exit stage left and shut up. I'm still inclined to do so, and my 'better judgement' is telling me I'm a fool for still posting. Perhaps the reason I'm still posting is that the people seem to be much less stupid than the sort I'm normally going around in circles with.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My impression is that what you call 'mainstream realism' is not very mainstream. Mainstream is more likely to be bodice rippers than literary realism.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I only implied that you were less funny than Harrison. But you are more deserving of a laugh, because you come off as far less of an ass.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, other than the one big difference that you and I would be inclined to say that Dublin is real (though, in point of fact, I've never been there), the process need not be inherently different. Supposing I wanted to write a novel in 1950's Los Angeles. Well, 1950's Los Angeles no more exists than does Minas Tirith. I can't go to either one and produce it. I have to create a simulation of either one if it is to get to the page. And for that matter, I can't put the real Dublin or Los Angeles of today on the page either. It's still also a simulation of the real thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>(Again) No, but it does include reading what the man says about his works and self. I'd queue up one of his works, but the word of mouth thus far hasn't been very good. Maybe when I next get down to the library and can't find anything else.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I agree its a retreat from messy dirtiness in its own way, as he's something of a Luddite, but it isn't a retreat from adult relationships or any of thier messiness. With that I can't agree. I see a whole lot of adults acting with alot of adult responcibility and carrying alot of adult concerns. That is, unless you define adult relationships as inherently disfunctional and define adult as infantile (which seems typical of 'drama'), in which case I can kinda maybe see your point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now that is a very good question, as I generally dislike the sort of thing that passes for 'human drama' and don't generally think of what I like in those terms. Tragedy. Sure. Comedy. Sure. But drama? I usually think of drama as being a story in which there is nothing more at stake than something petty, usually solely because of the character's pettyness, and that the author rather than making light of our folly or madness as humans seems to be taking the whole thing far too seriously as if that sort of behavior was a thing to be considered normal or even laudatory. Drama is comedy without the punch line or wit. You mention Shakespeare, whom I like very much. Is he drama? If so, I like Shakespeare. Perhaps it is best just to list a few authors greatly I admire and let you decide if there is anything that meets your definition of drama in that: Hugo, Twain, Steinbeck, Jane Austen, Silverburg, Iain M. Banks, Tim O'Brian, Dickens, Kipling, Faulkner, Wolfe, Steven Pressfield. Expanding out to movies, I like very much Casablanca, The Sound of Music, Chariots of Fire, Sense and Sensibility, and The Incredibles. I'm not sure if there is any drama in that either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I believe that that was Harrison's point so far as I could understand it. Incidently, where Mr. Harrison and I may agree is that we should eschew the illusion of realism of a certain sort as a standard for judging the literary merit of a work. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't say that they didn't. I pretty clearly implied that I watched Gillmore girls at least on occassion and found something of merit there (jumped the shark several seasons ago though). I just implied that I find them at least no less fantastic, nor more relevant to my life, and no more realistic than Lord of the Rings. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That sounds like a very good plan, though I generally drink whiskey rather than gin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3467748, member: 4937"] LOL. Normally at this point in a thread's life, I'm inclined to exit stage left and shut up. I'm still inclined to do so, and my 'better judgement' is telling me I'm a fool for still posting. Perhaps the reason I'm still posting is that the people seem to be much less stupid than the sort I'm normally going around in circles with. LOL. My impression is that what you call 'mainstream realism' is not very mainstream. Mainstream is more likely to be bodice rippers than literary realism. I only implied that you were less funny than Harrison. But you are more deserving of a laugh, because you come off as far less of an ass. Well, other than the one big difference that you and I would be inclined to say that Dublin is real (though, in point of fact, I've never been there), the process need not be inherently different. Supposing I wanted to write a novel in 1950's Los Angeles. Well, 1950's Los Angeles no more exists than does Minas Tirith. I can't go to either one and produce it. I have to create a simulation of either one if it is to get to the page. And for that matter, I can't put the real Dublin or Los Angeles of today on the page either. It's still also a simulation of the real thing. (Again) No, but it does include reading what the man says about his works and self. I'd queue up one of his works, but the word of mouth thus far hasn't been very good. Maybe when I next get down to the library and can't find anything else. Well, I agree its a retreat from messy dirtiness in its own way, as he's something of a Luddite, but it isn't a retreat from adult relationships or any of thier messiness. With that I can't agree. I see a whole lot of adults acting with alot of adult responcibility and carrying alot of adult concerns. That is, unless you define adult relationships as inherently disfunctional and define adult as infantile (which seems typical of 'drama'), in which case I can kinda maybe see your point. Now that is a very good question, as I generally dislike the sort of thing that passes for 'human drama' and don't generally think of what I like in those terms. Tragedy. Sure. Comedy. Sure. But drama? I usually think of drama as being a story in which there is nothing more at stake than something petty, usually solely because of the character's pettyness, and that the author rather than making light of our folly or madness as humans seems to be taking the whole thing far too seriously as if that sort of behavior was a thing to be considered normal or even laudatory. Drama is comedy without the punch line or wit. You mention Shakespeare, whom I like very much. Is he drama? If so, I like Shakespeare. Perhaps it is best just to list a few authors greatly I admire and let you decide if there is anything that meets your definition of drama in that: Hugo, Twain, Steinbeck, Jane Austen, Silverburg, Iain M. Banks, Tim O'Brian, Dickens, Kipling, Faulkner, Wolfe, Steven Pressfield. Expanding out to movies, I like very much Casablanca, The Sound of Music, Chariots of Fire, Sense and Sensibility, and The Incredibles. I'm not sure if there is any drama in that either. No, I believe that that was Harrison's point so far as I could understand it. Incidently, where Mr. Harrison and I may agree is that we should eschew the illusion of realism of a certain sort as a standard for judging the literary merit of a work. I didn't say that they didn't. I pretty clearly implied that I watched Gillmore girls at least on occassion and found something of merit there (jumped the shark several seasons ago though). I just implied that I find them at least no less fantastic, nor more relevant to my life, and no more realistic than Lord of the Rings. That sounds like a very good plan, though I generally drink whiskey rather than gin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Worldbuilding is Bad
Top