Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Worldbuilding is Bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3476401" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I really don't buy that a particular race is necessarily breaking of an entire genre. Elves have been fleet-footed nomads, undead-worshiping near-necromancers, and immortal Fair Folk, depending on the context of the world. Whereas TMNT and Greyhawk are obviously trying for different ends, "elf" doesn't imply any particular world context.</p><p></p><p>But even laying that aside, it's still saying "you must run on these tracks and you are forbidden to go where I do not allow you." It's saying it at character generation rather than in actual play, but it's the same limiting of options to run down a small selection of possible tracks. Again, not that that's a necessarily negative thing.</p><p></p><p>As for Thorpton, I probably didn't go far enough in the description. If the DM won't let you cross the Ocean of Sessler (whatever the PC's try to do), he's wearing a conductor's hat. He's saying "stay on track, don't jump away to another continent." If he lets you cross the ocean with ADVENTURE, then you're right, it's probably not railroading. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not that it would be, just that it could be, depending on the usual factors (namely, DM and player preference for it). In the same way that massive detailed info-worship is fun for some DM's and players, the opposite (I don't know until I make it up, my only rule is that I can't contradict myself) is fun for others. I've seen it work. I've worked it myself. You don't need to know anything about the setting. Indeed, it can even work when the players know *more* about the setting than the DM. Tell them to develop their homeland, their village, their nation, why they are the race and class that they are, tell them to think of a reason to work together, to meet, and just get used to saying "yes" and pushing the buttons the players made with the problem-causing ways of every DM out there. </p><p></p><p>Might not be your style, o'course, but that's okay. It's just showing that preliminary DM setting detail is not always a requisite component for a good game of D&D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3476401, member: 2067"] I really don't buy that a particular race is necessarily breaking of an entire genre. Elves have been fleet-footed nomads, undead-worshiping near-necromancers, and immortal Fair Folk, depending on the context of the world. Whereas TMNT and Greyhawk are obviously trying for different ends, "elf" doesn't imply any particular world context. But even laying that aside, it's still saying "you must run on these tracks and you are forbidden to go where I do not allow you." It's saying it at character generation rather than in actual play, but it's the same limiting of options to run down a small selection of possible tracks. Again, not that that's a necessarily negative thing. As for Thorpton, I probably didn't go far enough in the description. If the DM won't let you cross the Ocean of Sessler (whatever the PC's try to do), he's wearing a conductor's hat. He's saying "stay on track, don't jump away to another continent." If he lets you cross the ocean with ADVENTURE, then you're right, it's probably not railroading. :) Not that it would be, just that it could be, depending on the usual factors (namely, DM and player preference for it). In the same way that massive detailed info-worship is fun for some DM's and players, the opposite (I don't know until I make it up, my only rule is that I can't contradict myself) is fun for others. I've seen it work. I've worked it myself. You don't need to know anything about the setting. Indeed, it can even work when the players know *more* about the setting than the DM. Tell them to develop their homeland, their village, their nation, why they are the race and class that they are, tell them to think of a reason to work together, to meet, and just get used to saying "yes" and pushing the buttons the players made with the problem-causing ways of every DM out there. Might not be your style, o'course, but that's okay. It's just showing that preliminary DM setting detail is not always a requisite component for a good game of D&D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Worldbuilding is Bad
Top