Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 3557350" data-attributes="member: 22779">RC - If I answered your poll honestly, I would be forced to say yes in all three editions as well.&nbsp; But, that's because in 1e I ran Dragonlance twice, I ran my homebrew a couple of times in 2e and, out of the six campaigns I've been involved in in 3.5 edition, I've use Scarred Lands twice.But, you are right, my second poll is a screw up.&nbsp; lolWhat it says to me, is that about a 1/3 of DM's aren't all that concerned with setting and are more than willing to move on to a new setting with each campaign.&nbsp; I never said that this idea was for everyone.&nbsp; Heck, the idea of setting first has been so ingrained into the mindset of gamers I'd be shocked if the results of my poll were any different.&nbsp; My point is that common wisdom may be mistaken.&nbsp; That setting isn't anywhere near as important as people make it out to be.&nbsp; That if you craft decent adventures, setting can pretty much go sit in the corner.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 3557350, member: 22779"] RC - If I answered your poll honestly, I would be forced to say yes in all three editions as well. But, that's because in 1e I ran Dragonlance twice, I ran my homebrew a couple of times in 2e and, out of the six campaigns I've been involved in in 3.5 edition, I've use Scarred Lands twice. But, you are right, my second poll is a screw up. lol What it says to me, is that about a 1/3 of DM's aren't all that concerned with setting and are more than willing to move on to a new setting with each campaign. I never said that this idea was for everyone. Heck, the idea of setting first has been so ingrained into the mindset of gamers I'd be shocked if the results of my poll were any different. My point is that common wisdom may be mistaken. That setting isn't anywhere near as important as people make it out to be. That if you craft decent adventures, setting can pretty much go sit in the corner. [/QUOTE]

Verification