Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why wouldn't you always cast on the defensive?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al'Kelhar" data-source="post: 1271345" data-attributes="member: 7884"><p>Indeed, that's what I do. The first Concentration check is simply representative of whether you are adept at avoiding (or withstanding without injury) the blow which is inevitably directed at you. Someone else pointed out that the Concentration check should be fixed, as it only represents the spell caster keeping an eye on an opponent while casting, i.e. multi-tasking. That's fine, but I use the first of two Concentration checks as a proxy for AC, not to represent whether you can multi-task. In fact, my rule is slightly more complex, in that you add any dodge bonus to your AC to your Concentration roll to give your total roll against which the attacker's attack roll is compared. I have a second Concentration roll which determines the consequences of a successful attack against the spellcaster, and spell level <em>is</em> factored into that. The process goes something like:</p><p></p><p>1. Spellcaster decides to cast a spell while threatened.</p><p></p><p>2. Attacker decides whether or not to use attack of opportunity on spellcaster.</p><p></p><p>3. If attacker decides to AoO the spellcaster, spellcaster rolls a modified Concentration check (d20 + Concentration skill + any dodge bonus to AC).</p><p></p><p>4. The spellcaster's AC against that AoO is the higher of the modified Concentration check and his normal AC.</p><p></p><p>5. The attacker rolls the attack roll for the AoO normally, and if he hits the spellcaster's AC as determined above, he hits the spellcaster.</p><p></p><p>6. If the attacker hits the spellcaster, the spellcaster must make a normal Concentration check in response (10 + spell level + damage suffered) or lose the spell.</p><p></p><p>In practice, this has worked out well and now my players are comfortable with it, it doesn't take much time out of combat.</p><p></p><p>Cheers, Al'Kelhar</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al'Kelhar, post: 1271345, member: 7884"] Indeed, that's what I do. The first Concentration check is simply representative of whether you are adept at avoiding (or withstanding without injury) the blow which is inevitably directed at you. Someone else pointed out that the Concentration check should be fixed, as it only represents the spell caster keeping an eye on an opponent while casting, i.e. multi-tasking. That's fine, but I use the first of two Concentration checks as a proxy for AC, not to represent whether you can multi-task. In fact, my rule is slightly more complex, in that you add any dodge bonus to your AC to your Concentration roll to give your total roll against which the attacker's attack roll is compared. I have a second Concentration roll which determines the consequences of a successful attack against the spellcaster, and spell level [I]is[/I] factored into that. The process goes something like: 1. Spellcaster decides to cast a spell while threatened. 2. Attacker decides whether or not to use attack of opportunity on spellcaster. 3. If attacker decides to AoO the spellcaster, spellcaster rolls a modified Concentration check (d20 + Concentration skill + any dodge bonus to AC). 4. The spellcaster's AC against that AoO is the higher of the modified Concentration check and his normal AC. 5. The attacker rolls the attack roll for the AoO normally, and if he hits the spellcaster's AC as determined above, he hits the spellcaster. 6. If the attacker hits the spellcaster, the spellcaster must make a normal Concentration check in response (10 + spell level + damage suffered) or lose the spell. In practice, this has worked out well and now my players are comfortable with it, it doesn't take much time out of combat. Cheers, Al'Kelhar [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why wouldn't you always cast on the defensive?
Top