Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why ya gotta be so Basic? Understanding the Resurgence of Moldvay's Basic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 9533520" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Straightforward, clearly-explained rules with good organization... and essentially no oddball rules that you're not really interested in. With the exception of initiative rules being a bit arcane, infravision being stupid about realism, and AC being upside down, it's as straightforward and minimal a set of rules for fantasy adventuring that you can imagine. The fact that it gives direct, step-by-step instructions to the DM for how to make an adventure... something which the books seldom seem to do... is part of why it was well liked.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">No, not really. The "systems" in the game are largely ad hoc but simple enough to feel consistent. However, if anything the game strongly favors natural language.<br /> <br /> Like, here's Wall of Fire:<br /> <br /> Wall of Fire<br /> Range: 60'<br /> Duration: special<br /> This spell creates a thin wall of fire of up to 1200 square feet. The<br /> wall can be in any shape the caster desires (a straight wall 60' long<br /> and 20' high, a circle 20' diameter and 20' high, etc.). The wall is<br /> opaque and will block sight. Creatures of less than 4 hit dice cannot<br /> break through the wall. Creatures of 4 or more hit dice can break<br /> through but will take 1-6 (d6) points of damage — twice this<br /> amount (2d6) if they are undead or cold-using creatures (white<br /> dragons, frost giants). The wall cannot be cast in a space occupied<br /> by another object. The wall lasts as long as the caster remains stationary<br /> and concentrates on it.<br /> <br /> Now, any modern D&D player can find a dozen questions in that paragraph, and I can tell you now that essentially none of them are answered in the book. Can I cast the wall in the air? Can the wall be horizontal? The monster entries don't tell you if it's a cold-using creature, so how do I decide? The wall can't be cast in a space occupied by another object. Are creatures objects? The game doesn't really say, thought Locate Object and other spells suggest a consistent line of thinking. Neither creature nor object appear in the glossary, though.<br /> <br /> If you look up spellcasting, you'll find several paragraphs trying to explain Vancian casting, or a few paragraphs explaining spellbooks, or a paragraph explaining that you can't move or take other actions when casting. But that's really it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">"Roll d20. Apply a modifier of up to -4 to +4. If you're under your relevant attribute, you succeed." is the entire mechanic. It's not extensible so much as fragments of a skeleton.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">It's more like the Pareto principle. It doesn't care about having good rules as much as it cares about having simple ones. Basic gives you 80% of the rules you need. Those rules cover 80% of the situations where they come up. The game is otherwise so stripped down and so... generally consistent feeling that it feels easy to make a ruling and move on. You don't feel like you do making house rules in AD&D where it seems like kicking a precariously balanced house of cards.<br /> <br /> Expert gives you 80% of the 20% left out. you get rules for making castles, running ships, spell research. handling getting lost, wilderness encounters, campaign world building, etc. It doesn't have mass combat rules? I think that's about the only major thing missing. Again, they're not the best rules. They're often just 1 paragraph. But they're not awful, either, and they're good enough for the game's purposes overall.<br /> <br /> There are extensive examples in the DM chapters. "Here's the steps to make a dungeon." (4 pages). Then, "Here's what a dungeon made doing that might look like." (2 pages describing 9 rooms + 2 map pages) Then, "Here's what the play session might sound like in this dialogue between the DM and their players." (1.5 pages) It's nice and makes it easy to visualize how to play.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">There are no character choices except those made in game. You choose your class and equipment. You can arrange your stats and modify them slightly. That's about it. There aren't really any mechanics. Like the default rules say all weapons deal d6 damage. It's an optional rule to use variable weapon damage. Character creation is about as simple as Nethack's is.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 9533520, member: 6777737"] [LIST=1] [*]Straightforward, clearly-explained rules with good organization... and essentially no oddball rules that you're not really interested in. With the exception of initiative rules being a bit arcane, infravision being stupid about realism, and AC being upside down, it's as straightforward and minimal a set of rules for fantasy adventuring that you can imagine. The fact that it gives direct, step-by-step instructions to the DM for how to make an adventure... something which the books seldom seem to do... is part of why it was well liked. [*]No, not really. The "systems" in the game are largely ad hoc but simple enough to feel consistent. However, if anything the game strongly favors natural language. Like, here's Wall of Fire: Wall of Fire Range: 60' Duration: special This spell creates a thin wall of fire of up to 1200 square feet. The wall can be in any shape the caster desires (a straight wall 60' long and 20' high, a circle 20' diameter and 20' high, etc.). The wall is opaque and will block sight. Creatures of less than 4 hit dice cannot break through the wall. Creatures of 4 or more hit dice can break through but will take 1-6 (d6) points of damage — twice this amount (2d6) if they are undead or cold-using creatures (white dragons, frost giants). The wall cannot be cast in a space occupied by another object. The wall lasts as long as the caster remains stationary and concentrates on it. Now, any modern D&D player can find a dozen questions in that paragraph, and I can tell you now that essentially none of them are answered in the book. Can I cast the wall in the air? Can the wall be horizontal? The monster entries don't tell you if it's a cold-using creature, so how do I decide? The wall can't be cast in a space occupied by another object. Are creatures objects? The game doesn't really say, thought Locate Object and other spells suggest a consistent line of thinking. Neither creature nor object appear in the glossary, though. If you look up spellcasting, you'll find several paragraphs trying to explain Vancian casting, or a few paragraphs explaining spellbooks, or a paragraph explaining that you can't move or take other actions when casting. But that's really it. [*]"Roll d20. Apply a modifier of up to -4 to +4. If you're under your relevant attribute, you succeed." is the entire mechanic. It's not extensible so much as fragments of a skeleton. [*]It's more like the Pareto principle. It doesn't care about having good rules as much as it cares about having simple ones. Basic gives you 80% of the rules you need. Those rules cover 80% of the situations where they come up. The game is otherwise so stripped down and so... generally consistent feeling that it feels easy to make a ruling and move on. You don't feel like you do making house rules in AD&D where it seems like kicking a precariously balanced house of cards. Expert gives you 80% of the 20% left out. you get rules for making castles, running ships, spell research. handling getting lost, wilderness encounters, campaign world building, etc. It doesn't have mass combat rules? I think that's about the only major thing missing. Again, they're not the best rules. They're often just 1 paragraph. But they're not awful, either, and they're good enough for the game's purposes overall. There are extensive examples in the DM chapters. "Here's the steps to make a dungeon." (4 pages). Then, "Here's what a dungeon made doing that might look like." (2 pages describing 9 rooms + 2 map pages) Then, "Here's what the play session might sound like in this dialogue between the DM and their players." (1.5 pages) It's nice and makes it easy to visualize how to play. [*]There are no character choices except those made in game. You choose your class and equipment. You can arrange your stats and modify them slightly. That's about it. There aren't really any mechanics. Like the default rules say all weapons deal d6 damage. It's an optional rule to use variable weapon damage. Character creation is about as simple as Nethack's is. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why ya gotta be so Basic? Understanding the Resurgence of Moldvay's Basic
Top