Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why you shouldn't use 5 ft corridors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kmart Kommando" data-source="post: 3583332" data-attributes="member: 39915"><p>Here's an idea I've been kicking around while reading this thread:</p><p></p><p>Has a few steps though..</p><p></p><p>Go with the 3ft square idea, convert all movement to that scale.</p><p>Take Iron Heroes' idea of 1/4 of your movement counts for no AoOs instead of the 5ft step. (though the 5ft step needs adjustment as well)</p><p>Now you have a 6ft shift, instead of 5ft step. (more movement = more tactical movement, and less static 5ft step full attack.)</p><p>For threatening areas, you have around your 3ft square, (assuming a medium creature) a ring of close range, and also threaten the next ring out, long range.</p><p>Divide weapons into close range melee, long range melee, and reach weapons. (also some with multiple ranges) </p><p>Have a -2 to -4 to hit using a weapon on a target not in its range, like great sword on a guy 3ft from you, or dagger on a guy 6ft away. I didn't crunch numbers, but it sounds fun.</p><p></p><p>So, a normal medium sized humanoid has a 30ft move, or 10 3ft squares, can move up to 2 squares without provoking an AoO, the same at this speed as the 6ft (2 square) shift and still do a full attack.</p><p>Add in IH's skill challenges, and you can do like a tumble or jump check, or whatever is appropriate to the situation, to gain more movement for one round, then a 40ft move gets you 3 squares to move without an AoO, 50ft move a 4 square move, etc.</p><p></p><p>Then you have 6ft corridors, where 2 guys stand and fight side by side, and it looks real enough, plus you have wiggle room for having more action than 5ft step, full attack, 5ft step, cast spell, etc.</p><p></p><p>You can still have 2 opponents holding each other at arm's reach, since both are using great axes, and one guy can ditch the axe, quick draw a short sword and get up in his face with a 6ft (2square) shift.</p><p></p><p>Reach weapons will kind of be threatening more area, but opponents have a bit more movement to get by, if they can.</p><p></p><p>Might want to go with Tumble as an opposed roll as well.</p><p></p><p>You might need more room on the table for the battle mat though. I'd give up my dice, paper, and snack spot for something like this. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kmart Kommando, post: 3583332, member: 39915"] Here's an idea I've been kicking around while reading this thread: Has a few steps though.. Go with the 3ft square idea, convert all movement to that scale. Take Iron Heroes' idea of 1/4 of your movement counts for no AoOs instead of the 5ft step. (though the 5ft step needs adjustment as well) Now you have a 6ft shift, instead of 5ft step. (more movement = more tactical movement, and less static 5ft step full attack.) For threatening areas, you have around your 3ft square, (assuming a medium creature) a ring of close range, and also threaten the next ring out, long range. Divide weapons into close range melee, long range melee, and reach weapons. (also some with multiple ranges) Have a -2 to -4 to hit using a weapon on a target not in its range, like great sword on a guy 3ft from you, or dagger on a guy 6ft away. I didn't crunch numbers, but it sounds fun. So, a normal medium sized humanoid has a 30ft move, or 10 3ft squares, can move up to 2 squares without provoking an AoO, the same at this speed as the 6ft (2 square) shift and still do a full attack. Add in IH's skill challenges, and you can do like a tumble or jump check, or whatever is appropriate to the situation, to gain more movement for one round, then a 40ft move gets you 3 squares to move without an AoO, 50ft move a 4 square move, etc. Then you have 6ft corridors, where 2 guys stand and fight side by side, and it looks real enough, plus you have wiggle room for having more action than 5ft step, full attack, 5ft step, cast spell, etc. You can still have 2 opponents holding each other at arm's reach, since both are using great axes, and one guy can ditch the axe, quick draw a short sword and get up in his face with a 6ft (2square) shift. Reach weapons will kind of be threatening more area, but opponents have a bit more movement to get by, if they can. Might want to go with Tumble as an opposed roll as well. You might need more room on the table for the battle mat though. I'd give up my dice, paper, and snack spot for something like this. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why you shouldn't use 5 ft corridors
Top