Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
wielding two weapons... but not TWF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aluvial" data-source="post: 5154933" data-attributes="member: 6862"><p>I don't see it this way at all. A weapon used for an AoO that is in your off hand, takes a -4 penalty to attack. That's it. Nothing else. It matters not if you have been, or even are planning to TWF. The AoO action is independent of other things you have done, or will do in the round because it happens out of your turn (Other penalties apply for Power Attack, Combat Experitse, etc). I believe that there should be no Side 1 at all. Side 1 is a different animal from Side A. Having a weapon in your off hand, or a wand, or a potion, or a shield, has no bearing on your primary hand's attack if you are only using the primary hand to attack with. Just having another item in your off-hand does not constitute a penalty.</p><p> </p><p>Side A, as you call it, refers to making TWF attacks only. An extra attack for an AoO is always made at your best BAB bonus (minus Power Attack etc.). Again, if the character purposefully chose to attack with the off hand weapon for the AoO, they would take the NORMAL -4 penalty for doing so with the off hand. This is not the case by the RAW. Clearly, you must take penalties if attacking with your off hand weapon as a full or standard action, or when making TWF attacks. This is not the case by the RAW. Clearly, you only take penalties when attacking with an off hand weapon as a full or standard action, or if making TWF attacks. You do not take a penalty just for having two weapons in hand. I wanted to comment on this... I'm not sure what having a reach weapon (assuming it is two handed I suppose) has to do with a discussion on off handedness. It seems to be a completely different animal. Except that Side 1 is not an option considering the RAW. </p><p> </p><p>I believe that the confusion comes from individuals who believe that there is no penalties for <u>using</u> an off hand weapon. Just go look in the glossary and the other three locations in the rules that mention off handedness just slip into place. </p><p> </p><p>To be clear, off hand weapon attacks take a -4 (for full, standard, AoO, and extra attacks). TWF attacks have a seperate chart to follow <u>because</u> you are fighting with both hands. These are two different circumstances. </p><p> </p><p>Therefore, you must, at the time of character creation, be specific about handedness.</p><p> </p><p>Aluvial</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aluvial, post: 5154933, member: 6862"] I don't see it this way at all. A weapon used for an AoO that is in your off hand, takes a -4 penalty to attack. That's it. Nothing else. It matters not if you have been, or even are planning to TWF. The AoO action is independent of other things you have done, or will do in the round because it happens out of your turn (Other penalties apply for Power Attack, Combat Experitse, etc). I believe that there should be no Side 1 at all. Side 1 is a different animal from Side A. Having a weapon in your off hand, or a wand, or a potion, or a shield, has no bearing on your primary hand's attack if you are only using the primary hand to attack with. Just having another item in your off-hand does not constitute a penalty. Side A, as you call it, refers to making TWF attacks only. An extra attack for an AoO is always made at your best BAB bonus (minus Power Attack etc.). Again, if the character purposefully chose to attack with the off hand weapon for the AoO, they would take the NORMAL -4 penalty for doing so with the off hand. This is not the case by the RAW. Clearly, you must take penalties if attacking with your off hand weapon as a full or standard action, or when making TWF attacks. This is not the case by the RAW. Clearly, you only take penalties when attacking with an off hand weapon as a full or standard action, or if making TWF attacks. You do not take a penalty just for having two weapons in hand. I wanted to comment on this... I'm not sure what having a reach weapon (assuming it is two handed I suppose) has to do with a discussion on off handedness. It seems to be a completely different animal. Except that Side 1 is not an option considering the RAW. I believe that the confusion comes from individuals who believe that there is no penalties for [U]using[/U] an off hand weapon. Just go look in the glossary and the other three locations in the rules that mention off handedness just slip into place. To be clear, off hand weapon attacks take a -4 (for full, standard, AoO, and extra attacks). TWF attacks have a seperate chart to follow [U]because[/U] you are fighting with both hands. These are two different circumstances. Therefore, you must, at the time of character creation, be specific about handedness. Aluvial [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
wielding two weapons... but not TWF
Top