Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wildshape + Animal Growth =/= huge size
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corwin" data-source="post: 1153117" data-attributes="member: 1560"><p>Wow, it's amazing how this <em>was</em> a pretty civilized discussion that wrapped up for the most part. Now a bunch of condescending (and some, wrong) people show up and try to "show me". Jeez. Lame.</p><p></p><p>I already stated I could very well be wrong but this is the way I read it. I still do. Others as well. How are you people changing that? Nothing you've added is new to the discussion that Souljourner hasn't already said. Post count inflation? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Xavim: To claim SU effects aren't magical is laughable. And, yes, they are subject to antimagic. If your going to come in to a discussion to school someone, I advise you to first learn the curriculum. Especially when you toss around flagrant arrogance using statements like, "I think I can safely say that this closes the deal." Gaul.</p><p></p><p>Besides that, my point about dispellability was in relation to melkoriii's comparison of <em>reincarnate</em> to <em>polymorph</em>. Last time I checked, those were both spells. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>Zaruthustran: If you'd bother to go back and read my posts, you'd see I was the one that brought up the fact that original size is not factored into a druid's Wildshape options. Where are you going with this? Are you trying to reiterate what I already said or something?</p><p></p><p>You claim it's not broken. I beg to differ. Did you actually look at the numbers, or are you just interested in proving me wrong so you can continue to play a broken druid? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Take a 9th level druid and Wildshape him into a Dire Ape and <em>animal growth</em> him into Huge with DR 10/magic and the save bonuses. Tell me that isn't inappropriately sick...</p><p></p><p>Don't just say it can't be that bad. Actually look at it.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry folks if this seems like I'm getting a little defensive. But you people all come rushing in here effectively <em>after</em> the discussion has wound down and start ganging up and making undefendable claims. What's that about? Especially when some of it is patently BS or guess work. Really, I don’t mind other opinions. But don’t jump in here claiming you “know” the answer to a fuzzy question. Even Souljourner admits it isn’t completely clear. What do you know that we don’t?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corwin, post: 1153117, member: 1560"] Wow, it's amazing how this [i]was[/i] a pretty civilized discussion that wrapped up for the most part. Now a bunch of condescending (and some, wrong) people show up and try to "show me". Jeez. Lame. I already stated I could very well be wrong but this is the way I read it. I still do. Others as well. How are you people changing that? Nothing you've added is new to the discussion that Souljourner hasn't already said. Post count inflation? ;) Xavim: To claim SU effects aren't magical is laughable. And, yes, they are subject to antimagic. If your going to come in to a discussion to school someone, I advise you to first learn the curriculum. Especially when you toss around flagrant arrogance using statements like, "I think I can safely say that this closes the deal." Gaul. Besides that, my point about dispellability was in relation to melkoriii's comparison of [i]reincarnate[/i] to [i]polymorph[/i]. Last time I checked, those were both spells. :rolleyes: Zaruthustran: If you'd bother to go back and read my posts, you'd see I was the one that brought up the fact that original size is not factored into a druid's Wildshape options. Where are you going with this? Are you trying to reiterate what I already said or something? You claim it's not broken. I beg to differ. Did you actually look at the numbers, or are you just interested in proving me wrong so you can continue to play a broken druid? ;) Take a 9th level druid and Wildshape him into a Dire Ape and [i]animal growth[/i] him into Huge with DR 10/magic and the save bonuses. Tell me that isn't inappropriately sick... Don't just say it can't be that bad. Actually look at it. --- I'm sorry folks if this seems like I'm getting a little defensive. But you people all come rushing in here effectively [i]after[/i] the discussion has wound down and start ganging up and making undefendable claims. What's that about? Especially when some of it is patently BS or guess work. Really, I don’t mind other opinions. But don’t jump in here claiming you “know” the answer to a fuzzy question. Even Souljourner admits it isn’t completely clear. What do you know that we don’t? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wildshape + Animal Growth =/= huge size
Top