Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gargoyle" data-source="post: 956369" data-attributes="member: 529">The books I received (DMG and PHB) a few months ago didn't have art or diagrams yet, but were fairly nice and clean.&nbsp; &nbsp; There were some mistakes.&nbsp; We and other d20 publishers made certain to comment on any mistakes we found to WOTC as soon as possible.&nbsp; WOTC was happy to get the feedback; sometimes they had spotted the errors already, sometimes they hadn't.&nbsp;&nbsp; It's a good sign that the number of e-mails of this type dwindled to nearly nothing even before the books went to the printer.&nbsp; However, I'm certain that there will be some small errors to annoy us.&nbsp; The books are too big and complex to avoid that.&nbsp; (FDP Mike's post and Andy Collin's quote further up are dead on)&nbsp; But overall, I was impressed.&nbsp;&nbsp; Many sections that didn't have rule changes were edited to be more readable or received grammar improvements.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gargoyle, post: 956369, member: 529"] The books I received (DMG and PHB) a few months ago didn't have art or diagrams yet, but were fairly nice and clean. There were some mistakes. We and other d20 publishers made certain to comment on any mistakes we found to WOTC as soon as possible. WOTC was happy to get the feedback; sometimes they had spotted the errors already, sometimes they hadn't. It's a good sign that the number of e-mails of this type dwindled to nearly nothing even before the books went to the printer. However, I'm certain that there will be some small errors to annoy us. The books are too big and complex to avoid that. (FDP Mike's post and Andy Collin's quote further up are dead on) But overall, I was impressed. Many sections that didn't have rule changes were edited to be more readable or received grammar improvements. [/QUOTE]

Verification