Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will all spells be attacks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rechan" data-source="post: 4186461" data-attributes="member: 54846"><p>The point of having the abilities of your class is being able to solve solutions with your class's abilities.</p><p></p><p>A wizard can't push a boulder down a hill on some enemies if he has weak strength. A fighter can. Does that mean that the fighter shouldn't be able to because he can and the wizard Can't? </p><p></p><p>You seem to be saying "There should be non-magical creative uses; eliminate magical ones".</p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that a fighter could have come up with another plan. Just because the wizard did it with a spell doesn't give him an advantage. A rogue could've used ventriliquism, or tossed a stone, or a dozen other tricks. The magical means is just there as one tool in a kit, not the trump card that you're making it out to be.</p><p></p><p>The way you make it out to be, because a rogue has a good climb skill, and he climbs up above the door to get a good ambush position, that's <em>unfair</em> because the rogue has that option and has created it because he has a good climb skill.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, spellcasters sacrifice hit points and other benefits to be able to do things that others can't. Shoudl the wizard PC complain that he doesn't get to fight in melee? And in older editions, spellcasters had to fill those casting slots up with non-combat spells to ACHIEVE those creative uses; that rope trick could've been a much more effective spell. Are you saying that's not a suitable sacrifice?</p><p></p><p>Magic is only a crutch for a party when the other players refuse to use their heads. The problem isn't the magic, it's the unmotivated nonmagical players.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And? </p><p></p><p>Not only that, but magic isn't the only means. I've heard of a 3rd level party that defeated a hydra. Simply because they could out run it. It chased them while they shot it, it suddenly gave up and tried to run away, they chased it and continued to shoot it, it turned around and chased them - rinse repeat. It wasn't intelligent enough, nor did it have any other options, and so it was plinked to death. </p><p></p><p>Fantasy literature is <em>filled</em> with stories of weak people pulling off great, big things by just being <em>clever</em>. And that should be <em>rewarded</em>, not discouraged.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rechan, post: 4186461, member: 54846"] The point of having the abilities of your class is being able to solve solutions with your class's abilities. A wizard can't push a boulder down a hill on some enemies if he has weak strength. A fighter can. Does that mean that the fighter shouldn't be able to because he can and the wizard Can't? You seem to be saying "There should be non-magical creative uses; eliminate magical ones". Except that a fighter could have come up with another plan. Just because the wizard did it with a spell doesn't give him an advantage. A rogue could've used ventriliquism, or tossed a stone, or a dozen other tricks. The magical means is just there as one tool in a kit, not the trump card that you're making it out to be. The way you make it out to be, because a rogue has a good climb skill, and he climbs up above the door to get a good ambush position, that's [i]unfair[/i] because the rogue has that option and has created it because he has a good climb skill. Furthermore, spellcasters sacrifice hit points and other benefits to be able to do things that others can't. Shoudl the wizard PC complain that he doesn't get to fight in melee? And in older editions, spellcasters had to fill those casting slots up with non-combat spells to ACHIEVE those creative uses; that rope trick could've been a much more effective spell. Are you saying that's not a suitable sacrifice? Magic is only a crutch for a party when the other players refuse to use their heads. The problem isn't the magic, it's the unmotivated nonmagical players. And? Not only that, but magic isn't the only means. I've heard of a 3rd level party that defeated a hydra. Simply because they could out run it. It chased them while they shot it, it suddenly gave up and tried to run away, they chased it and continued to shoot it, it turned around and chased them - rinse repeat. It wasn't intelligent enough, nor did it have any other options, and so it was plinked to death. Fantasy literature is [i]filled[/i] with stories of weak people pulling off great, big things by just being [i]clever[/i]. And that should be [i]rewarded[/i], not discouraged. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will all spells be attacks?
Top