Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jdrakeh" data-source="post: 5100279" data-attributes="member: 13892">See? This is a problem. Apparently you think that you get to tell me what I can and cannot do. News flash: You don't. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm    :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" />Except that I was incorrectly told in a rather matter-of-fact manner that I had only two options available to me — buy the uncorrected 4e books or not game at all. The only reason I mentioned playing other games was because it is a perfectly reasonable alternative (and, more to the point, because it's the alternative I chose). If you go back to my very first post in this thread, you'll note that I say the uncorrected books have been keeping me out of 4e so far. I have every intention of buying into it when I know that the books include errata. But I play other games, too. And if it's between playing other games and not gaming at all? Well, I'd be a moron to turn down other games. Now, you may not want to play other games and spend your money on uncorrected books, fine; but you're in no position to tell me what I can and cannot do. Also, again, I haven't said anything about the awesomeness of the other games I play. I also haven't said that 4e is a bad game. So, again, you're still putting words in my mouth. Think you could cut that out?</blockquote>