Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Beginning of the End" data-source="post: 5269857" data-attributes="member: 55271">The two primary sins of Wave:(1) Poor navigation (notably the scrollbar, but there were lots of other problems, too)(2) Interrupted or uber-slow typing(3) Inability to give a wave a subject or titleThese pretty much disrupted its usefulness as a dynamic communication tool.Other major problems included:(1) Inability to specify passive viewers (who could see but not edit a wave)(2) Inability to remove people from a waveIf they could have figured out a way to cross-pollinate the content with regular e-mail that would have also been helpful.I feel that the designers wanted to force people to use wave in the most revolutionary way possible. They would have been better off creating a platform where I could have checked my e-mail, connected through regular chat, and ALSO created waves.So much potential. So completely wasted.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Beginning of the End, post: 5269857, member: 55271"] The two primary sins of Wave: (1) Poor navigation (notably the scrollbar, but there were lots of other problems, too) (2) Interrupted or uber-slow typing (3) Inability to give a wave a subject or title These pretty much disrupted its usefulness as a dynamic communication tool. Other major problems included: (1) Inability to specify passive viewers (who could see but not edit a wave) (2) Inability to remove people from a wave If they could have figured out a way to cross-pollinate the content with regular e-mail that would have also been helpful. I feel that the designers wanted to force people to use wave in the most revolutionary way possible. They would have been better off creating a platform where I could have checked my e-mail, connected through regular chat, and ALSO created waves. So much potential. So completely wasted. [/QUOTE]

Verification