Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will Pathfinder 2nd Edition Be Based on D&D 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7736743" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Yeah, I like 5e and I still think it's ridiculous to assume PF2 is going to be a 5e knockoff. 5e fans already have 5e, and PF fans already don't want to play 5e, so making PF2 a 5e knockoff would be an absolutely terrible idea, and I'm pretty sure Paizo is well aware of that. What they need to do if they want PF2 to be successful is make it its own, unique product, not knocking off any version of D&D, but that stays true to the feel of Pathfinder. Refine and accentuate the parts of the game that make it uniquely Pathfinder, and prune the bits that are only there to make it more like D&D 3.5.</p><p></p><p>I'm excited, even as someone who never cared for PF1. Good for Paizo for continuing to evolve their game, and good on them for keeping PF1 available for those who end up preferring it over PF2. If WotC had shown 3.5 the same respect when they started making 4e instead of panning it like they did, we might not have a Pathfinder to be getting a 2nd edition of. Luckily for Paizo, they can learn from WotC's mistakes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7736743, member: 6779196"] Yeah, I like 5e and I still think it's ridiculous to assume PF2 is going to be a 5e knockoff. 5e fans already have 5e, and PF fans already don't want to play 5e, so making PF2 a 5e knockoff would be an absolutely terrible idea, and I'm pretty sure Paizo is well aware of that. What they need to do if they want PF2 to be successful is make it its own, unique product, not knocking off any version of D&D, but that stays true to the feel of Pathfinder. Refine and accentuate the parts of the game that make it uniquely Pathfinder, and prune the bits that are only there to make it more like D&D 3.5. I'm excited, even as someone who never cared for PF1. Good for Paizo for continuing to evolve their game, and good on them for keeping PF1 available for those who end up preferring it over PF2. If WotC had shown 3.5 the same respect when they started making 4e instead of panning it like they did, we might not have a Pathfinder to be getting a 2nd edition of. Luckily for Paizo, they can learn from WotC's mistakes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will Pathfinder 2nd Edition Be Based on D&D 5E?
Top