Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 7737107" data-attributes="member: 4348">Obviously those who have the playtest are under an NDA, but their comments have basically shown...The main way it works is the same as 5e, but instead of a level bonus that goes to 6, they have it go to 20.&nbsp; Same idea, just goes higher.Spells actually work the exact same way...calls credibility when they state that they created it independently...I'd say they just want to avoid conflicts with WotC.Magic items being restricted to 3 items...sound familiar?They took the 5e chasis and expanded it...it's pretty obvious.The question is WHY they don't want to say it.Also...Morrus should have held off on the PF being moved the older editions, my D&amp;D forums are suddenly rife with all this PF stuff now!!!<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/rant.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rant:" title="Rant&nbsp; &nbsp; :rant:" data-shortname=":rant:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 7737107, member: 4348"] Obviously those who have the playtest are under an NDA, but their comments have basically shown... The main way it works is the same as 5e, but instead of a level bonus that goes to 6, they have it go to 20. Same idea, just goes higher. Spells actually work the exact same way...calls credibility when they state that they created it independently...I'd say they just want to avoid conflicts with WotC. Magic items being restricted to 3 items...sound familiar? They took the 5e chasis and expanded it...it's pretty obvious. The question is WHY they don't want to say it. Also...Morrus should have held off on the PF being moved the older editions, my D&D forums are suddenly rife with all this PF stuff now!!! :rant: [/QUOTE]

Verification