Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will Power magic system supplement online, free!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Drawmack" data-source="post: 1072830" data-attributes="member: 4981"><p><strong><u><em>Will Points v0.41 revision notes</em></u></strong></p><p></p><p>The items in this list fall into different categories. There are typos, formatting, clarity, rules and opinion. Each item will be noted as to which category if falls into by the word appearing in brackets (i.e. {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>}) after its number. The explanation of what each category means follows.</p><p></p><p><strong>Typo:</strong> something simple like a missing word, misspelled words or words out of order.</p><p><strong>Formatting:</strong> something is wrong with the format and should be corrected.</p><p><strong>Clarity:</strong> something about the rules is unclear and could use some clarification in the next version.</p><p><strong>Rules:</strong> there is something wrong with the rules. This could be opinion but is more likely to be a balance issue.</p><p><strong>Opinion:</strong> this is just something that I felt was out of place. There is no balance issue associated with it, it's just my gut feeling and should be treated as such.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: white"></span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 1)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} the header and footer (including the page numbers) do not print for me. Increase the gutter.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 2)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} page II, right column under Heroic Effect paragraph I line 7 Will point to effect a each roll: remove either the a or the each</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 3)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} page III, right column under Willdraught second paragraph line II reduces should be reducing</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 4)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} The benefit section of the channeling feat is written to reflect what happens when you don't have the feat. This should be rewritten to reflect what happens when you do have the feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 5)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} Benefit Section of the Hands-Free casting feat the reference should be linked to the appropriate point in the document.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 6)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} The last sentence in the benefit section of sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 7)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} The last sentence in the benefit section of advanced sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 8)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">rules</span>} Why doesn't supernatural healing provoke an attack of opportunity? Casting a healing spell would and this is almost the same.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 9)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} Way of Faith last sentence under benefit reads "if your base attack bonus attempt to stun a creature damage by your unarmed attacks." I can't even figure out what you?re trying to say here.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>10)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">opinion</span>} Way of Wind replaces the monks enhanced base speed. I don't think that burning will points every round is a good idea when what you're replacing is an always active class feature. I would say either up the duration (hour/day) or make it an always active feat that must be taken multiple times to gain more of an increase.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>11)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} In the priest class under daily consultation first line says "a can" should say "a priest can".</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>12)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} In the rules on magic you state that a caster can learn a spell by finding someone to teach them but you never provide rules for this. How does this work?</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>13)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} All will points spells require some type of somantic component paragraph. How does still spell effect this?</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>14)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} Casting Spells Carefully first sentence reads "A character wearing armor normally suffers the risk arcane spell failure", should read "A character wearing armor normally risks arcane spell failure"</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>15)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} Under sorcery the last sentence reads "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healing in any way except for natural rest." should read "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healed in any way except for natural rest."</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>16)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">opinion</span>} It would give even more of a boon to spellcraft ranks if caster level was gauged by them Caster level = spell craft ranks - 3, to a minimum of 1. This way if someone doesn't spend spellcraft ranks their spells stay weak even if they are safe. For things like magic missile and such.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"></span> </p><p><strong>Opinion:</strong> this is just something that I felt was out of place. There is no balance issue associated with it, it's just my gut feeling and should be treated as such.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: white"></span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 1)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} the header and footer (including the page numbers) do not print for me. Increase the gutter.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 2)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} page II, right column under Heroic Effect paragraph I line 7 Will point to effect a each roll: remove either the a or the each</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 3)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} page III, right column under Willdraught second paragraph line II reduces should be reducing</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 4)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} The benefit section of the channeling feat is written to reflect what happens when you don't have the feat. This should be rewritten to reflect what happens when you do have the feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 5)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} Benefit Section of the Hands-Free casting feat the reference should be linked to the appropriate point in the document.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 6)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} The last sentence in the benefit section of sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 7)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">formatting</span>} The last sentence in the benefit section of advanced sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 8)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">rules</span>} Why doesn't supernatural healing provoke an attack of opportunity? Casting a healing spell would and this is almost the same.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong> 9)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} Way of Faith last sentence under benefit reads "if your base attack bonus attempt to stun a creature damage by your unarmed attacks." I can't even figure out what you?re trying to say here.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>10)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">opinion</span>} Way of Wind replaces the monks enhanced base speed. I don't think that burning will points every round is a good idea when what you're replacing is an always active class feature. I would say either up the duration (hour/day) or make it an always active feat that must be taken multiple times to gain more of an increase.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>11)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} In the priest class under daily consultation first line says "a can" should say "a priest can".</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>12)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} In the rules on magic you state that a caster can learn a spell by finding someone to teach them but you never provide rules for this. How does this work?</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>13)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">clarity</span>} All will points spells require some type of somantic component paragraph. How does still spell effect this?</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>14)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} Casting Spells Carefully first sentence reads "A character wearing armor normally suffers the risk arcane spell failure", should read "A character wearing armor normally risks arcane spell failure"</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>15)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">typo</span>} Under sorcery the last sentence reads "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healing in any way except for natural rest." should read "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healed in any way except for natural rest."</span></p><p><span style="color: white"><strong>16)</strong> {<span style="color: orange">opinion</span>} It would give even more of a boon to spellcraft ranks if caster level was gauged by them Caster level = spell craft ranks - 3, to a minimum of 1. This way if someone doesn't spend spellcraft ranks their spells stay weak even if they are safe. For things like magic missile and such.</span></p><p><span style="color: white"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Drawmack, post: 1072830, member: 4981"] [b][u][i]Will Points v0.41 revision notes[/i][/u][/b] The items in this list fall into different categories. There are typos, formatting, clarity, rules and opinion. Each item will be noted as to which category if falls into by the word appearing in brackets (i.e. {[color=orange]typo[/color]}) after its number. The explanation of what each category means follows. [b]Typo:[/b] something simple like a missing word, misspelled words or words out of order. [b]Formatting:[/b] something is wrong with the format and should be corrected. [b]Clarity:[/b] something about the rules is unclear and could use some clarification in the next version. [b]Rules:[/b] there is something wrong with the rules. This could be opinion but is more likely to be a balance issue. [b]Opinion:[/b] this is just something that I felt was out of place. There is no balance issue associated with it, it's just my gut feeling and should be treated as such. [color=white] [b] 1)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} the header and footer (including the page numbers) do not print for me. Increase the gutter. [b] 2)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} page II, right column under Heroic Effect paragraph I line 7 Will point to effect a each roll: remove either the a or the each [b] 3)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} page III, right column under Willdraught second paragraph line II reduces should be reducing [b] 4)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} The benefit section of the channeling feat is written to reflect what happens when you don't have the feat. This should be rewritten to reflect what happens when you do have the feat. [b] 5)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} Benefit Section of the Hands-Free casting feat the reference should be linked to the appropriate point in the document. [b] 6)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} The last sentence in the benefit section of sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat. [b] 7)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} The last sentence in the benefit section of advanced sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat. [b] 8)[/b] {[color=orange]rules[/color]} Why doesn't supernatural healing provoke an attack of opportunity? Casting a healing spell would and this is almost the same. [b] 9)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} Way of Faith last sentence under benefit reads "if your base attack bonus attempt to stun a creature damage by your unarmed attacks." I can't even figure out what you?re trying to say here. [b]10)[/b] {[color=orange]opinion[/color]} Way of Wind replaces the monks enhanced base speed. I don't think that burning will points every round is a good idea when what you're replacing is an always active class feature. I would say either up the duration (hour/day) or make it an always active feat that must be taken multiple times to gain more of an increase. [b]11)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} In the priest class under daily consultation first line says "a can" should say "a priest can". [b]12)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} In the rules on magic you state that a caster can learn a spell by finding someone to teach them but you never provide rules for this. How does this work? [b]13)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} All will points spells require some type of somantic component paragraph. How does still spell effect this? [b]14)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} Casting Spells Carefully first sentence reads "A character wearing armor normally suffers the risk arcane spell failure", should read "A character wearing armor normally risks arcane spell failure" [b]15)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} Under sorcery the last sentence reads "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healing in any way except for natural rest." should read "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healed in any way except for natural rest." [b]16)[/b] {[color=orange]opinion[/color]} It would give even more of a boon to spellcraft ranks if caster level was gauged by them Caster level = spell craft ranks - 3, to a minimum of 1. This way if someone doesn't spend spellcraft ranks their spells stay weak even if they are safe. For things like magic missile and such. [/color] [b]Opinion:[/b] this is just something that I felt was out of place. There is no balance issue associated with it, it's just my gut feeling and should be treated as such. [color=white] [b] 1)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} the header and footer (including the page numbers) do not print for me. Increase the gutter. [b] 2)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} page II, right column under Heroic Effect paragraph I line 7 Will point to effect a each roll: remove either the a or the each [b] 3)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} page III, right column under Willdraught second paragraph line II reduces should be reducing [b] 4)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} The benefit section of the channeling feat is written to reflect what happens when you don't have the feat. This should be rewritten to reflect what happens when you do have the feat. [b] 5)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} Benefit Section of the Hands-Free casting feat the reference should be linked to the appropriate point in the document. [b] 6)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} The last sentence in the benefit section of sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat. [b] 7)[/b] {[color=orange]formatting[/color]} The last sentence in the benefit section of advanced sorcery should appear in the special section for this feat. [b] 8)[/b] {[color=orange]rules[/color]} Why doesn't supernatural healing provoke an attack of opportunity? Casting a healing spell would and this is almost the same. [b] 9)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} Way of Faith last sentence under benefit reads "if your base attack bonus attempt to stun a creature damage by your unarmed attacks." I can't even figure out what you?re trying to say here. [b]10)[/b] {[color=orange]opinion[/color]} Way of Wind replaces the monks enhanced base speed. I don't think that burning will points every round is a good idea when what you're replacing is an always active class feature. I would say either up the duration (hour/day) or make it an always active feat that must be taken multiple times to gain more of an increase. [b]11)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} In the priest class under daily consultation first line says "a can" should say "a priest can". [b]12)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} In the rules on magic you state that a caster can learn a spell by finding someone to teach them but you never provide rules for this. How does this work? [b]13)[/b] {[color=orange]clarity[/color]} All will points spells require some type of somantic component paragraph. How does still spell effect this? [b]14)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} Casting Spells Carefully first sentence reads "A character wearing armor normally suffers the risk arcane spell failure", should read "A character wearing armor normally risks arcane spell failure" [b]15)[/b] {[color=orange]typo[/color]} Under sorcery the last sentence reads "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healing in any way except for natural rest." should read "Any hit points lost to Sorcery cannot be healed in any way except for natural rest." [b]16)[/b] {[color=orange]opinion[/color]} It would give even more of a boon to spellcraft ranks if caster level was gauged by them Caster level = spell craft ranks - 3, to a minimum of 1. This way if someone doesn't spend spellcraft ranks their spells stay weak even if they are safe. For things like magic missile and such. [/color] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will Power magic system supplement online, free!
Top