Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Will there be such a game as D&D Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6100252" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>It surely seems like that's your argument in the context of what I recall your positions being expressed as previously, but perhaps I'm missing something there. My point is that there's NOTHING weird about Mike advocating for old-school sensibilities, he's been in that camp since day one. I don't know a lot about what Mike did before 2008, I don't own any of that stuff, wasn't even slightly interested in 3e, but he's been unabashedly a 1e fan for at least the last 5 years. So when you say "Yeah, that's weird" my response is "actually, no it isn't weird". The words 'in charge' are rather a red herring, you were stating that he was responsible for AEDU being in 4e, but in fact that is not at all true, Rob Heinsoo is responsible for that. Mike might have invented the mechanic, but for all I know it was 34th in a bullet list of suggestions he made, I can't say. Rob picked it up and ran with it, and Bill Slavicek signed off on it. Had Mike been in charge who knows what we would have gotten?</p><p></p><p>That's all there was to it. I'm not trying to get into some sort of fight over it. Mike probably ALWAYS had the same problems with Warlords. I don't know what would be the purpose of stating that he's acting weird now would be overall except to minimize the significance of the whole "shouting limbs back on" statement and spin it as being more acceptable to say me, as in "He's just playing devil's advocate here, look he did a lot of the core 4e design." My response is merely, "this is not weird for Mike, he's simply not in tune with my sensibilities, and 4e is not evidence to the contrary." which is at least a reasonable argument, IMHO. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, if the whole thing makes sense some other way, then that's fine, I don't get it, but its not really a big deal. We're all cool. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6100252, member: 82106"] It surely seems like that's your argument in the context of what I recall your positions being expressed as previously, but perhaps I'm missing something there. My point is that there's NOTHING weird about Mike advocating for old-school sensibilities, he's been in that camp since day one. I don't know a lot about what Mike did before 2008, I don't own any of that stuff, wasn't even slightly interested in 3e, but he's been unabashedly a 1e fan for at least the last 5 years. So when you say "Yeah, that's weird" my response is "actually, no it isn't weird". The words 'in charge' are rather a red herring, you were stating that he was responsible for AEDU being in 4e, but in fact that is not at all true, Rob Heinsoo is responsible for that. Mike might have invented the mechanic, but for all I know it was 34th in a bullet list of suggestions he made, I can't say. Rob picked it up and ran with it, and Bill Slavicek signed off on it. Had Mike been in charge who knows what we would have gotten? That's all there was to it. I'm not trying to get into some sort of fight over it. Mike probably ALWAYS had the same problems with Warlords. I don't know what would be the purpose of stating that he's acting weird now would be overall except to minimize the significance of the whole "shouting limbs back on" statement and spin it as being more acceptable to say me, as in "He's just playing devil's advocate here, look he did a lot of the core 4e design." My response is merely, "this is not weird for Mike, he's simply not in tune with my sensibilities, and 4e is not evidence to the contrary." which is at least a reasonable argument, IMHO. Anyway, if the whole thing makes sense some other way, then that's fine, I don't get it, but its not really a big deal. We're all cool. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Will there be such a game as D&D Next?
Top