Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="D'karr" data-source="post: 6100829" data-attributes="member: 336">Okay.Then.For someone that says that they are not using snark, it sure sounds a lot like it, and condescending too.I did not feel that it was necessary to further clarify.  What I said was clear - "we and WotC", in the same paragraph even.  So jumping to the conclusion that I was saying that the responsibility was all Mearls was incorrect and I pointed that out, and I didn't see a need to expand on it.And here you go again, here you make assumptions.  Who is talking about attacking any editions?  I was not butthurt when TSR put out 2e, or WotC put out 3.0. I was not butthurt when WotC put out 3.5 or 4e, and I sure as heck am not going to be butthurt when they put out DDN, 6.x, 10i, or the next 70 editions.  I'm not posting any bias.  I'm not blaming WotC or even Mearls for anything.  I simply said what I meant.  We the fans need to not get our panties in a bunch, and WotC should stop saying stupid things.  Is there more context needed to that?No, no snark, just a clear answer to your question.  Did you get it incorrectly?  Yes you did.  Then I quoted exactly what you had quoted and there was no snark there either.  If you took that as snark, I don't know what to say to you.  I'm not being defensive in this, I have said - and you quoted, exactly what I meant.That sounds good.Yep, same to you.</blockquote>