Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will You Count "Roman Numeral" Books As Core?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 3816666" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>"Core 3" Worked for me in 3E and 3.5 because I always considered everything in the PHB, DMG, and MM to be very well balanced, applicable to all campaigns, and not so "out there" it couldn't find a place in 90% of D&D campaigns out there. When any of our DMs said, "core books plus this other stuff", we knew what it meant, and worked off of the same base. </p><p></p><p>My largest concern is that the material in the later expansions will not be nearly as well tested as the original set, and problem rules will slip in through the cracks (like, oh say, the Energy Missile as originally written in the Expanded Psi Handbook, or the Frenzied Berserker in Complete Warrior. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />) Even the much-vaunted Druidic shapechange from 3.5 that was touted as "game-breaking" I've never seen a problem with, only heard second-hand. Having "core" be very open-ended means a larger pool to stuff to pass/fail on a case by case, and DMs having to go case-by-case what they will and won't allow in a given game.</p><p></p><p>Me, I dislike the idea of Tieflings being a core race from the start, just on general story grounds; it presumes to me a much more default planar-open cosmology than I'm used to. Maybe I'll change my mind when it gets here, but on first blush I am very hesitant about it, as one example.</p><p></p><p>So when I tell a group, "I'm starting a new campaign, core books only," I'll instead have to say,<em> "I'm starting a new campaign, all PHB 1 races except Tieflings and Eladrin, all classes from the PHB 1 except Warlock, Include the bard from PHB 2, and exclude the new ability from the bard's such-and-such talent tree,"</em> or something similar. or worse -- go back to that ugly tradition from 2nd edition, and make pages of house rules of what's included and excluded from each book in the "core" series, as well as any expansions.</p><p></p><p>OR.... I've just treat each game as its own totally separate entity, and run totally different types of campaigns for 4E than I would for 3E and lower.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 3816666, member: 158"] "Core 3" Worked for me in 3E and 3.5 because I always considered everything in the PHB, DMG, and MM to be very well balanced, applicable to all campaigns, and not so "out there" it couldn't find a place in 90% of D&D campaigns out there. When any of our DMs said, "core books plus this other stuff", we knew what it meant, and worked off of the same base. My largest concern is that the material in the later expansions will not be nearly as well tested as the original set, and problem rules will slip in through the cracks (like, oh say, the Energy Missile as originally written in the Expanded Psi Handbook, or the Frenzied Berserker in Complete Warrior. :)) Even the much-vaunted Druidic shapechange from 3.5 that was touted as "game-breaking" I've never seen a problem with, only heard second-hand. Having "core" be very open-ended means a larger pool to stuff to pass/fail on a case by case, and DMs having to go case-by-case what they will and won't allow in a given game. Me, I dislike the idea of Tieflings being a core race from the start, just on general story grounds; it presumes to me a much more default planar-open cosmology than I'm used to. Maybe I'll change my mind when it gets here, but on first blush I am very hesitant about it, as one example. So when I tell a group, "I'm starting a new campaign, core books only," I'll instead have to say,[I] "I'm starting a new campaign, all PHB 1 races except Tieflings and Eladrin, all classes from the PHB 1 except Warlock, Include the bard from PHB 2, and exclude the new ability from the bard's such-and-such talent tree,"[/I] or something similar. or worse -- go back to that ugly tradition from 2nd edition, and make pages of house rules of what's included and excluded from each book in the "core" series, as well as any expansions. OR.... I've just treat each game as its own totally separate entity, and run totally different types of campaigns for 4E than I would for 3E and lower. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Will You Count "Roman Numeral" Books As Core?
Top