Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Will you make transsexual Elves canon in your games ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 7439454" data-attributes="member: 57112"><p>Coming in late and there's a few points I wanted to address:</p><p></p><p>1) The big one is that representation matters. I don't remember who said it, but to paraphrase an earlier post "Reach where you're most able to reach." 5e has already done a great job of opening the door the gender fluidity in the PHB; this simply creates a more concrete idea and tying it to the androgynous-ness of Corellon and the mutability that's being established with the 5e elvish mythos. Makes perfect sense, and if I ran in FR I would definitely use it.</p><p>2) "Trans" is the <em>generally</em> accepted "umbrella" term for all manner of gender- and sex-nonconforming identities, but it would be a mistake to suggest that everyone within that community appreciates the term, and there's actually quite a bit of strife within and between gender- and sex-nonconforming identities; ie; folx complaining about "gender reassignment" surgery as capitulating to a gender binary, transsexual-identified individuals equating drag performances to blackface, intersex erasure, etc. While there is a compelling reason for the use of "trans" as a catch-all umbrella term, just be aware that not all that would be classified within that umbrella would appreciate the term. Speaking of which...</p><p>3) "Queer" as a reclaimed word tends to have its roots in intersectional identity analysis, particularly with regards to race and class stratification (I've heard that San Fransisco is gay and Oakland is queer, for instance). While not universal, I've noticed that those who adopt "queer" as a moniker tend to care less about "normalization" or other tactics that they'd consider "assimilation", and rather more about expressing one's identity without regards to what others individually or society as a whole thinks, which is why "genderqueer" might be an identity used by people who may not necessarily agree that society treating being gender nonconforming as nothing particularly special or out of the ordinary is a worthy goal. "Queer" also tends to coincide much more with more radical political causes as well. As a result, you can kind of see why many in the LGBTQIA community (particularly the folx who stop at the "T", if they even make it that far) might not mesh as well with anyone using the term "queer" as a part of the identity. For another point of departure, ask a person who identifies as primarily as "queer" how big a deal marriage equality is.</p><p>4) The main point to all of this is that there's a lot of diversity itself within the LGBTQIA, such that quibbling semantics over terminology or lexicon doesn't really do anybody any justice. I've found that the most successful (or at least most respectful) way to go is to respect everyone's preferences and identities individually and not make large sweeping generalizations as a whole. "Don't yuck my yum," as it were. I assume there are many gamers who might identify as "trans" that think the Gift of Corellon is awesome or amazing; I also assume there are those that roll their eyes at it. Neither is particularly right or wrong in the larger sense of those terms, but the fact that it would appeal to some marginalized gamers is alone worth it, in my book.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gradine, post: 7439454, member: 57112"] Coming in late and there's a few points I wanted to address: 1) The big one is that representation matters. I don't remember who said it, but to paraphrase an earlier post "Reach where you're most able to reach." 5e has already done a great job of opening the door the gender fluidity in the PHB; this simply creates a more concrete idea and tying it to the androgynous-ness of Corellon and the mutability that's being established with the 5e elvish mythos. Makes perfect sense, and if I ran in FR I would definitely use it. 2) "Trans" is the [I]generally[/I] accepted "umbrella" term for all manner of gender- and sex-nonconforming identities, but it would be a mistake to suggest that everyone within that community appreciates the term, and there's actually quite a bit of strife within and between gender- and sex-nonconforming identities; ie; folx complaining about "gender reassignment" surgery as capitulating to a gender binary, transsexual-identified individuals equating drag performances to blackface, intersex erasure, etc. While there is a compelling reason for the use of "trans" as a catch-all umbrella term, just be aware that not all that would be classified within that umbrella would appreciate the term. Speaking of which... 3) "Queer" as a reclaimed word tends to have its roots in intersectional identity analysis, particularly with regards to race and class stratification (I've heard that San Fransisco is gay and Oakland is queer, for instance). While not universal, I've noticed that those who adopt "queer" as a moniker tend to care less about "normalization" or other tactics that they'd consider "assimilation", and rather more about expressing one's identity without regards to what others individually or society as a whole thinks, which is why "genderqueer" might be an identity used by people who may not necessarily agree that society treating being gender nonconforming as nothing particularly special or out of the ordinary is a worthy goal. "Queer" also tends to coincide much more with more radical political causes as well. As a result, you can kind of see why many in the LGBTQIA community (particularly the folx who stop at the "T", if they even make it that far) might not mesh as well with anyone using the term "queer" as a part of the identity. For another point of departure, ask a person who identifies as primarily as "queer" how big a deal marriage equality is. 4) The main point to all of this is that there's a lot of diversity itself within the LGBTQIA, such that quibbling semantics over terminology or lexicon doesn't really do anybody any justice. I've found that the most successful (or at least most respectful) way to go is to respect everyone's preferences and identities individually and not make large sweeping generalizations as a whole. "Don't yuck my yum," as it were. I assume there are many gamers who might identify as "trans" that think the Gift of Corellon is awesome or amazing; I also assume there are those that roll their eyes at it. Neither is particularly right or wrong in the larger sense of those terms, but the fact that it would appeal to some marginalized gamers is alone worth it, in my book. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Will you make transsexual Elves canon in your games ?
Top