Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gargoyle" data-source="post: 6335305" data-attributes="member: 529">Because for me, this isn't an argument. I'm not trying to &quot;win&quot;.&nbsp; I was responding to his post with more detail about my opinion.&nbsp; I'm not trying to change his opinion or even disagree with him, so I acknowledged there are other viewpoints.&nbsp; Sorry if I didn't communicate that, but that's what I was going for. I know these forums have become a debate club for some people, but I don't care about that; I'm not going to go down a checklist of logical fallacies to make sure I &quot;win&quot;.&nbsp; I see the point of intelligent discussion, and I really do try to think about what I post, but I refuse to spend the time and effort to post a perfect argument to support all my opinions.&nbsp; And I try not to be critical of the opinion's of others, even when I believe they are flat out wrong, because I don't have the time for it, and would prefer just discussing D&amp;D, rather than arguing about it. I'm a casual poster here, bordering on being a lurker, because I don't care for the confrontations.&nbsp; Some people thrive on it, I don't.Back to the topic:I disagree that I &quot;created my own problem.&quot;&nbsp; I don't like non-magical healing because I can't describe wounds (something that DM's are encouraged to do) and then retroactively undescribe them without my suspension of disbelief suffering.&nbsp; It's just a minor nitpick I have, because I really do love the warlord class and the teamwork it created.&nbsp; My workaround when running 4e was to infer that their abilities were indeed magical.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gargoyle, post: 6335305, member: 529"] Because for me, this isn't an argument. I'm not trying to "win". I was responding to his post with more detail about my opinion. I'm not trying to change his opinion or even disagree with him, so I acknowledged there are other viewpoints. Sorry if I didn't communicate that, but that's what I was going for. I know these forums have become a debate club for some people, but I don't care about that; I'm not going to go down a checklist of logical fallacies to make sure I "win". I see the point of intelligent discussion, and I really do try to think about what I post, but I refuse to spend the time and effort to post a perfect argument to support all my opinions. And I try not to be critical of the opinion's of others, even when I believe they are flat out wrong, because I don't have the time for it, and would prefer just discussing D&D, rather than arguing about it. I'm a casual poster here, bordering on being a lurker, because I don't care for the confrontations. Some people thrive on it, I don't. Back to the topic: I disagree that I "created my own problem." I don't like non-magical healing because I can't describe wounds (something that DM's are encouraged to do) and then retroactively undescribe them without my suspension of disbelief suffering. It's just a minor nitpick I have, because I really do love the warlord class and the teamwork it created. My workaround when running 4e was to infer that their abilities were indeed magical. [/QUOTE]

Verification