Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
With 5e here, what will 4e be remembered for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Emerikol" data-source="post: 6335747" data-attributes="member: 6698278"><p>The only problem is that prior to 4e people described things however they liked. And plenty of people did it all different sorts of ways. There were plenty of grievous wounds my heroes heroically ignored in all those editions. Nothing smashed me in the fact that this was wrong.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't matter one bit and you can drone on all day about it if you want if other people played different or the rules said this or that. Apparently those same rules were vague enough to be interpreted in widely different ways. 4e absolutely slammed the door on that style of game. They should have realized they were on dangerous ground but they didn't.</p><p></p><p>This is a 4e thread though so that is all I will comment on this subjection.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As for umbran's comments, I would just say that I mind not a bit if people attack an inanimate object like a game. I may disagree and I will defend my side but I don't consider it an attack upon me personally. I see it as an attack upon an inanimate object that I happen to like and others don't like. No one is breaking down my door and trying to force me to do anything.</p><p></p><p>The key is not to stop arguing. Because guess what... enworld would be a ghost town without the debate. So would the D&D boards. The debate drives these forums and makes them interesting. Yes on occasion someone goes too far but that is the exception in my opinion. I've found that arguing my position and defending it has sharpened by understanding of games a lot. I'm far more aware of my preferences than I was prior to engaging. So I consider a person who presents decent arguments and gives reasonable responses to questions and yes counter arguments, to be someone I respect and like. I have many on these and other boards that I never agree with but that I do respect. One quick example would be MechaPilot. She rarely agrees except on the broader concerns of inclusivity but I still feel like a conversation is possible and fruitful.</p><p></p><p>The people I can't get anything worthwhile out of in a discussion I tend to just block.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Emerikol, post: 6335747, member: 6698278"] The only problem is that prior to 4e people described things however they liked. And plenty of people did it all different sorts of ways. There were plenty of grievous wounds my heroes heroically ignored in all those editions. Nothing smashed me in the fact that this was wrong. It doesn't matter one bit and you can drone on all day about it if you want if other people played different or the rules said this or that. Apparently those same rules were vague enough to be interpreted in widely different ways. 4e absolutely slammed the door on that style of game. They should have realized they were on dangerous ground but they didn't. This is a 4e thread though so that is all I will comment on this subjection. As for umbran's comments, I would just say that I mind not a bit if people attack an inanimate object like a game. I may disagree and I will defend my side but I don't consider it an attack upon me personally. I see it as an attack upon an inanimate object that I happen to like and others don't like. No one is breaking down my door and trying to force me to do anything. The key is not to stop arguing. Because guess what... enworld would be a ghost town without the debate. So would the D&D boards. The debate drives these forums and makes them interesting. Yes on occasion someone goes too far but that is the exception in my opinion. I've found that arguing my position and defending it has sharpened by understanding of games a lot. I'm far more aware of my preferences than I was prior to engaging. So I consider a person who presents decent arguments and gives reasonable responses to questions and yes counter arguments, to be someone I respect and like. I have many on these and other boards that I never agree with but that I do respect. One quick example would be MechaPilot. She rarely agrees except on the broader concerns of inclusivity but I still feel like a conversation is possible and fruitful. The people I can't get anything worthwhile out of in a discussion I tend to just block. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
With 5e here, what will 4e be remembered for?
Top