Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Underman" data-source="post: 5989239" data-attributes="member: 6696705">That's the beauty of that solution. You choose a character concept that justifies dangerous risk taking [author stance at character creation] furthered by the DM designing adventures accordingly [director stance] allowing you to be in actor stance for most of the adventure at least for that perspective.It's none of my business in your case, and by all means, you can circle around that rabbit hole for more years to come, but maybe the problem isn't what you think it is <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> In situations like this, I just agree to disagree. Otherwise, ya it would be a continued source of frustration if I worried about what why people liked stuff I didn't (horror movies come to mind, not to mention the usual politics and all that real-life stuff we're not allowed to discuss).</blockquote>