Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizard Traditions...What would be ideal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3784995" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>This quote from Dave Noonan...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Got me to thinking that the wizard traditions will be something like the Force-Traditions in Star Wars saga ed. For those that don't know what Force Traditions are, they are basically a grouping of talents(basically feats) that one gains access to when they are a member of the tradition. The "traditions" have membership requirements that one must meet before joining them but, based on SW saga ed., they are not based on mechanics but on specific details of a character (some examples are gender, planet of origin, etc.). If this is the case I have a few concerns I'd like to express. </p><p></p><p>Now one of my concerns with this is that, instead of providing rules and structure for making these "traditions", WotC will just give us these four examples and a statement along the lines of "you can easily make up more traditions" and leave it at that (this was basically what they did in SW and with D&D 3.x with Prestige Classses). I would rather have a real system for creating balanced traditions in D&D if this is the case.</p><p></p><p>Another concern I have is about balance and interactions. I guess this is a more general concern with the game as a whole but fits in this topic as well. There seem to be numerous categories of abilities (racial traits, traditions, class abilities, feats, etc.) and I am concerned at how well all of these will be balanced against each other as well as when used in tandem with each other.</p><p></p><p>Finally, if no system is presented to design traditions, I am worried about the specificity of the example traditions. I think there is a fine line between what could be considered, neutral talents and those that are more specific in nature. An example of this disparity in 3.x is the difference between the Sorcerers bloodline feats, where they have to have the blood of a specific creature(thus assuming that creature exsists in every campaign world) to gain access and metamagic feats which anyone could use. It will probably be hard to make tradition talents totally generic, but I hope that the designer's lean more in this direction than the other. (and yes I know bloodline feats can be wrangled into a generic form, but the less work to do that, the better IMHO). In other words I would hope that I could use these talents out of the box without pre-supposing certain campaign paradigms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3784995, member: 48965"] This quote from Dave Noonan... Got me to thinking that the wizard traditions will be something like the Force-Traditions in Star Wars saga ed. For those that don't know what Force Traditions are, they are basically a grouping of talents(basically feats) that one gains access to when they are a member of the tradition. The "traditions" have membership requirements that one must meet before joining them but, based on SW saga ed., they are not based on mechanics but on specific details of a character (some examples are gender, planet of origin, etc.). If this is the case I have a few concerns I'd like to express. Now one of my concerns with this is that, instead of providing rules and structure for making these "traditions", WotC will just give us these four examples and a statement along the lines of "you can easily make up more traditions" and leave it at that (this was basically what they did in SW and with D&D 3.x with Prestige Classses). I would rather have a real system for creating balanced traditions in D&D if this is the case. Another concern I have is about balance and interactions. I guess this is a more general concern with the game as a whole but fits in this topic as well. There seem to be numerous categories of abilities (racial traits, traditions, class abilities, feats, etc.) and I am concerned at how well all of these will be balanced against each other as well as when used in tandem with each other. Finally, if no system is presented to design traditions, I am worried about the specificity of the example traditions. I think there is a fine line between what could be considered, neutral talents and those that are more specific in nature. An example of this disparity in 3.x is the difference between the Sorcerers bloodline feats, where they have to have the blood of a specific creature(thus assuming that creature exsists in every campaign world) to gain access and metamagic feats which anyone could use. It will probably be hard to make tradition talents totally generic, but I hope that the designer's lean more in this direction than the other. (and yes I know bloodline feats can be wrangled into a generic form, but the less work to do that, the better IMHO). In other words I would hope that I could use these talents out of the box without pre-supposing certain campaign paradigms. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizard Traditions...What would be ideal?
Top