Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 9162309" data-attributes="member: 6801845">Well thanks so much for giving me permission to state my opinion. Exactly how it's completely useless to base how well a class meets it's goals, or what those goals could possibly be, other than having broad appeal to the people playing the game alludes me.&nbsp; But you have my permission to explain what other aspects you could measure that are truly objective and not just your personal preference. Without appealing to to some hypothetical majority that cannot be validated of course. I stand by what I said. In a game with multiple competing options the only objective measurement we can make is what people choose to play. That doesn't mean it's the best fighter that could hypothetically exist, there's always room for improvement. But in comparison to the other classes that actually exist in the game? People choose fighter over the other options.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 9162309, member: 6801845"] Well thanks so much for giving me permission to state my opinion. Exactly how it's completely useless to base how well a class meets it's goals, or what those goals could possibly be, other than having broad appeal to the people playing the game alludes me. But you have my permission to explain what other aspects you could measure that are truly objective and not just your personal preference. Without appealing to to some hypothetical majority that cannot be validated of course. I stand by what I said. In a game with multiple competing options the only objective measurement we can make is what people choose to play. That doesn't mean it's the best fighter that could hypothetically exist, there's always room for improvement. But in comparison to the other classes that actually exist in the game? People choose fighter over the other options. [/QUOTE]

Verification