Kae'Yoss
First Post
Nightfall said:*pauses*...
Okay. You need a vacation my friend.
And leave this ninjamancer-proof room? No way!
Nightfall said:*pauses*...
Okay. You need a vacation my friend.
bobacus said:I have been watching the trades and certain signs point to Hasbro selling off D&D IPs or just abandoning it all together.
point one-the ending of Dragon and dungeon magazine
point two- lack of any catalog or even HINTS on what is coming next year.
Point 3-Hasbro is bleeding money (mostly from there WOTC aquisition things)
So Some signs look to be a sell off. I wouldnt be surprised.
Razz said:ANOTHER SIGN! Now I have always been skeptical on 4E rumors, but I am seeing a lot of signs now and this is definitely another one. It's too much of a coincidence now. I have to start my own conspiracy theory now.
Reclaiming the license on Dragon and Dungeon is exactly the opposite of selling off IP. If you followed the issue, you would know that the decision was made to strengthen WotC's Digital Initiative, which is in the works.bobacus said:I have been watching the trades and certain signs point to Hasbro selling off D&D IPs or just abandoning it all together.
point one-the ending of Dragon and dungeon magazine
Bob, look at the 5th post in this very thread. We have products up to Spring 2008. That's roughly 9 months ahead, which is how WotC has announced their products for quite some time. Nothing strange is going on there.bobacus said:point two- lack of any catalog or even HINTS on what is coming next year.
Please quantify what you are talking about. Are you suggesting Hasbro is going to lose money because the Dragonlance, Kenzer and Paizo licenses are expiring? Are you suggesting the Transformers card game or Star Wars RPG are losing a lot of money? Where did you come by this unintuitive information?bobacus said:Point 3-Hasbro is bleeding money (mostly from there WOTC aquisition things)
Frankly Bob, I would die of shock.bobacus said:So Some signs look to be a sell off. I wouldnt be surprised.
This would be perfectly logical... if WotC had been printing Dungeon or Dragon. They weren't. Whatever those costs were, they were born by Paizo. And WotC wasn't paying PAIZO; presumably, Paizo was paying WotC for use of the license. So the idea that WotC pulled Paizo's license because it was costing WotC too much money (directly) doesn't hold water. With that said...bobacus said:Why? cause printing is costing too much.
Doesn't seem curious to me at all - seems quite obvious. They're trying to put the genie back in the bottle.bobacus said:Plus I found they are letting more and more liscenses expire....curiouser and curiouser...