Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards are not rational/scientists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8454695" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>I think that if the bolded is true, and this was done using the scientific method, that person is a scientist, regardless of whatever else they also do. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Science wasn’t a term, so sure. I won’t get into the experiential observation elements (unverified personal gnosis in modern pagan parlance) of the mystic praxis, but it wasn’t quite as “woo” as it may seem from a modern perspective. They applied logical methodology to their mysticism. Quite sophisticated methodology, or “ritual technology”, in fact. </p><p></p><p>Sure you are. You’re just <em>also</em> doing other stuff. They aren’t mutually exclusive. Even less so in a world where the mysticism not only works, but works predictably, and in ways that are deeply tied to how the universe works. Understanding how fire magic interacts with thermodynamics and with the mystical underpinnings of mortal and immortal consciousness and with the Plane of Fire, is all the same activity in D&D. </p><p> </p><p>But even if the mysticism is separated from the rest, doing a mysticism doesn’t preclude also doing a science. </p><p></p><p>I don’t think we were ever off topic, tbh. </p><p> </p><p>How we are each using the term scientist is pretty central to understanding any part of the discussion. </p><p> </p><p>Side note, about things like the “pun” nature of material components and the like. My way of looking at it with my gnome rogue/Wizard alchemist is that if bat guano and saltpeter can create an explosion of fire, he reasons, and is experimenting to test the idea, that some admixture of those materials must be associated on some natural or cosmological level with explosions of fire. We can hypothesize that this should be true because we have shown through experiment and through logical analysis that material components have a resonance with some part of the universe, either consciousness, cosmology, or material nature. </p><p> </p><p>By understanding how the elements of spells interact and commingle to create the predictable spell effect, we can expand our understanding of nature, and this comes around to also then increase our understanding of the component parts of magic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8454695, member: 6704184"] I think that if the bolded is true, and this was done using the scientific method, that person is a scientist, regardless of whatever else they also do. Science wasn’t a term, so sure. I won’t get into the experiential observation elements (unverified personal gnosis in modern pagan parlance) of the mystic praxis, but it wasn’t quite as “woo” as it may seem from a modern perspective. They applied logical methodology to their mysticism. Quite sophisticated methodology, or “ritual technology”, in fact. Sure you are. You’re just [I]also[/I] doing other stuff. They aren’t mutually exclusive. Even less so in a world where the mysticism not only works, but works predictably, and in ways that are deeply tied to how the universe works. Understanding how fire magic interacts with thermodynamics and with the mystical underpinnings of mortal and immortal consciousness and with the Plane of Fire, is all the same activity in D&D. But even if the mysticism is separated from the rest, doing a mysticism doesn’t preclude also doing a science. I don’t think we were ever off topic, tbh. How we are each using the term scientist is pretty central to understanding any part of the discussion. Side note, about things like the “pun” nature of material components and the like. My way of looking at it with my gnome rogue/Wizard alchemist is that if bat guano and saltpeter can create an explosion of fire, he reasons, and is experimenting to test the idea, that some admixture of those materials must be associated on some natural or cosmological level with explosions of fire. We can hypothesize that this should be true because we have shown through experiment and through logical analysis that material components have a resonance with some part of the universe, either consciousness, cosmology, or material nature. By understanding how the elements of spells interact and commingle to create the predictable spell effect, we can expand our understanding of nature, and this comes around to also then increase our understanding of the component parts of magic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards are not rational/scientists
Top