Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards: Bard to no longer suck
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jasin" data-source="post: 3744615" data-attributes="member: 7531"><p>If you've got a team of four people, you want four stars, not three stars and a backup.</p><p></p><p>Also, the flavour of the bard suggests a charismatic, in-the-spotlight, faceman kind of guy, not a backup. This, I think, is a subtler but significant problem with the bard. It's a class that models attention hogs, and has mechanics perfect for players who are anything but attention hogs.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But that's not really how the 3E bard works in practice. He's crap in combat unless he invests heavily in it. He's kind of OK at mind-control, but not as good as a sorcerer (or even wizard). He's good at lore, but only about as good as a wizard unless he invests heavily in it. The only thing he's really good at is social interaction, which usually doesn't make up enough of an adventurer's career to be viable as your single field of awesomeness.</p><p></p><p>I like bards enough to defend them in the "BARDZ SUX!!" threads, but I think it's much more difficult to play a bard you'll be happy with than a barbarian or a wizard. Which is an interesting challenge from a system mastery perspective, but it's in fact indicative of flawed design. If I could pick three 3E classes to rework completely, one of them would surely be the bard.</p><p></p><p>So with the opportunity presented by a new edition, I hope they do something cool with them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jasin, post: 3744615, member: 7531"] If you've got a team of four people, you want four stars, not three stars and a backup. Also, the flavour of the bard suggests a charismatic, in-the-spotlight, faceman kind of guy, not a backup. This, I think, is a subtler but significant problem with the bard. It's a class that models attention hogs, and has mechanics perfect for players who are anything but attention hogs. But that's not really how the 3E bard works in practice. He's crap in combat unless he invests heavily in it. He's kind of OK at mind-control, but not as good as a sorcerer (or even wizard). He's good at lore, but only about as good as a wizard unless he invests heavily in it. The only thing he's really good at is social interaction, which usually doesn't make up enough of an adventurer's career to be viable as your single field of awesomeness. I like bards enough to defend them in the "BARDZ SUX!!" threads, but I think it's much more difficult to play a bard you'll be happy with than a barbarian or a wizard. Which is an interesting challenge from a system mastery perspective, but it's in fact indicative of flawed design. If I could pick three 3E classes to rework completely, one of them would surely be the bard. So with the opportunity presented by a new edition, I hope they do something cool with them. Agreed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards: Bard to no longer suck
Top