Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Wizard's First Rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 1512846" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>Yes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, then, in your mind, the fact that he named the entire series "The <strong>Sword</strong> of Truth" doesn't have any bearing? I mean, if I wrote a novel called "Ice-Lances of Galspar" and then the entire novel involved people sitting around drinking tea in Galspar with the ice-lances slung over their shoulder, and occasionally people would scuffle, but the ice-lances would never come into play, I imagine that people would feel a bit misled.</p><p></p><p>So, I agree with you that it's a personal criticism on my part -- I like fight scenes. I don't need 'em all the time, thanks. However, in a series named after a sword, where the sword is the most powerful artifact (except for the boxes) in the book, I don't think hoping for a nice sword-fight somewhere is out of line.</p><p></p><p>And on an impersonal level, the few fights that were there were done badly. I'd have to hunt down the book again to quote stuff, but it was muddy and choppy and poorly detailed. I don't need to know every movement of every combatant (it's not good for a thirty-second fight to take five minutes to read), but a good writer knows which special details to add to give the reader enough information for their own minds to fill in the rest of the blanks. (There's a writing exercise that involves looking at the room around you, writing down every detail you can sense about that room until you've got a list of fifteen or twenty items, and then paring it down to the two or three things that you can say that will let the reader subconsciously fill in the rest of the details on his own -- I'm by no means great at it myself, but I can recognize good versus bad.) Goodkind was actually much better at the emotional aspects of his novel than the martial aspects -- I didn't like or find believable the emotions he raised, but at least he clearly articulated what he wanted me to think his characters were thinking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 1512846, member: 5171"] Yes. So, then, in your mind, the fact that he named the entire series "The [b]Sword[/b] of Truth" doesn't have any bearing? I mean, if I wrote a novel called "Ice-Lances of Galspar" and then the entire novel involved people sitting around drinking tea in Galspar with the ice-lances slung over their shoulder, and occasionally people would scuffle, but the ice-lances would never come into play, I imagine that people would feel a bit misled. So, I agree with you that it's a personal criticism on my part -- I like fight scenes. I don't need 'em all the time, thanks. However, in a series named after a sword, where the sword is the most powerful artifact (except for the boxes) in the book, I don't think hoping for a nice sword-fight somewhere is out of line. And on an impersonal level, the few fights that were there were done badly. I'd have to hunt down the book again to quote stuff, but it was muddy and choppy and poorly detailed. I don't need to know every movement of every combatant (it's not good for a thirty-second fight to take five minutes to read), but a good writer knows which special details to add to give the reader enough information for their own minds to fill in the rest of the blanks. (There's a writing exercise that involves looking at the room around you, writing down every detail you can sense about that room until you've got a list of fifteen or twenty items, and then paring it down to the two or three things that you can say that will let the reader subconsciously fill in the rest of the details on his own -- I'm by no means great at it myself, but I can recognize good versus bad.) Goodkind was actually much better at the emotional aspects of his novel than the martial aspects -- I didn't like or find believable the emotions he raised, but at least he clearly articulated what he wanted me to think his characters were thinking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Wizard's First Rule
Top