Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards getting character choice feedback from CB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riastlin" data-source="post: 5392786" data-attributes="member: 94022"><p>I can't access the editorial from work, but I seem to recall reading last night (when I was reading the editorial) that he stated they were going to look at how often a character was updated, etc. in addition to just pure numbers. In other words, if I create an Epic tier Runepriest and update it every week, adding a little bit of XP each week and an item here and there, then levelling up as the XP goes up, etc. it would be a lot more indicative of me actually playing an Epic Tier Runepriest than merely creating one and never updating it would. Obviously, I could be trying to game the system, but at least I'm being really dedicated about it in this instance. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p> </p><p>As an aside, I did e-mail them my thoughts on the subject (i.e. what does it mean when I don't play a shardmind). Personally, I would encourage others to do so. I've had good results in the past with getting responses from some of their peeps like Chris Perkins and Steve Winter. Obviously, they won't respond to everyone, but my guess is that they will read the submissions. If you're polite, odds are that you'll even help them interpret the data. I think they realize that they are opening a new window here (hence the comment "It's interesting but not yet useful"). I do believe that they want to address the public's concerns but its difficult to do without actual constructive feedback. I still think that the sheer number of classes and races will make it difficult for them to keep everyone happy as there will inevitably be a number of months in which the content misses the mark for the average person, but at least they seem to be trying.</p><p> </p><p>BTW, I love the idea of the feedback option for why you built the character you did. This could even trigger with each level up. "Why did you choose this power, or this feat?" That will give them an idea as to what makes certain choices so common. If they see a lot of people taking racial feats because they synergize with the character concept that they are building, then you'll see more of those. If; however they see that nobody wants a situational +1 feat bonus to hit, then we'll likely see less of those, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riastlin, post: 5392786, member: 94022"] I can't access the editorial from work, but I seem to recall reading last night (when I was reading the editorial) that he stated they were going to look at how often a character was updated, etc. in addition to just pure numbers. In other words, if I create an Epic tier Runepriest and update it every week, adding a little bit of XP each week and an item here and there, then levelling up as the XP goes up, etc. it would be a lot more indicative of me actually playing an Epic Tier Runepriest than merely creating one and never updating it would. Obviously, I could be trying to game the system, but at least I'm being really dedicated about it in this instance. :p As an aside, I did e-mail them my thoughts on the subject (i.e. what does it mean when I don't play a shardmind). Personally, I would encourage others to do so. I've had good results in the past with getting responses from some of their peeps like Chris Perkins and Steve Winter. Obviously, they won't respond to everyone, but my guess is that they will read the submissions. If you're polite, odds are that you'll even help them interpret the data. I think they realize that they are opening a new window here (hence the comment "It's interesting but not yet useful"). I do believe that they want to address the public's concerns but its difficult to do without actual constructive feedback. I still think that the sheer number of classes and races will make it difficult for them to keep everyone happy as there will inevitably be a number of months in which the content misses the mark for the average person, but at least they seem to be trying. BTW, I love the idea of the feedback option for why you built the character you did. This could even trigger with each level up. "Why did you choose this power, or this feat?" That will give them an idea as to what makes certain choices so common. If they see a lot of people taking racial feats because they synergize with the character concept that they are building, then you'll see more of those. If; however they see that nobody wants a situational +1 feat bonus to hit, then we'll likely see less of those, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards getting character choice feedback from CB
Top