Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards getting character choice feedback from CB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scribble" data-source="post: 5392993" data-attributes="member: 23977"><p>Ostensibly this type of question is exactly why having this type of data available is great.</p><p></p><p>The designers, instead of guessing, can actually look at the raw data and say, hey- this class only has one article, and no book support, yet a ton of people are playing it. </p><p></p><p>they can then get to work on figuring out WHY that is happening, and use it to improve their design work overall.</p><p></p><p>The main point not being that there is only one way to read the data, but that there actually IS solid data, as opposed to hunches, from which to start.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What I also find interesting is that it won't just be class level data... I'm sure they'll be able to look at just about EVERYTHING involved in character building.</p><p></p><p>How many times did people actually choose a certain feat or power?</p><p></p><p>Do people tend to go with the "optimal" build, or do people go with something else?</p><p></p><p>What percentage of people play female characters?</p><p></p><p>What percentage of people choose rituals? How about when they're not an arcane or divine class to begin with?</p><p></p><p>Do people multiclass?</p><p></p><p>They can even combine that info- do people who not like to play optimal builds tend to play certain classes? OR Certain races? What powers do they select? Etc...</p><p></p><p>Databases are AWESOME when it comes to looking at trends and raw data.</p><p></p><p>Once they actually get the Adventure tools in place, and if they can manage to build something that also lets DMs build encounters?</p><p></p><p>They will know a TON of info about our games. They might not read it right, or understand it completely, but it will be real data! </p><p></p><p></p><p>They'll even be able to look at this data compared to say- internet noise... Does all that debate about CAGI actually pan out to people not choosing CAGI? Or do a majority of people still select that power despite all the internet anger?</p><p></p><p></p><p>This thing has also just become a LOT more valuable to Wizards then it once was- which means they also now have a solid VALUE to show the people who control the purse strings. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Were I another game company... I;d being paying close attention to how this thing pans out. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scribble, post: 5392993, member: 23977"] Ostensibly this type of question is exactly why having this type of data available is great. The designers, instead of guessing, can actually look at the raw data and say, hey- this class only has one article, and no book support, yet a ton of people are playing it. they can then get to work on figuring out WHY that is happening, and use it to improve their design work overall. The main point not being that there is only one way to read the data, but that there actually IS solid data, as opposed to hunches, from which to start. What I also find interesting is that it won't just be class level data... I'm sure they'll be able to look at just about EVERYTHING involved in character building. How many times did people actually choose a certain feat or power? Do people tend to go with the "optimal" build, or do people go with something else? What percentage of people play female characters? What percentage of people choose rituals? How about when they're not an arcane or divine class to begin with? Do people multiclass? They can even combine that info- do people who not like to play optimal builds tend to play certain classes? OR Certain races? What powers do they select? Etc... Databases are AWESOME when it comes to looking at trends and raw data. Once they actually get the Adventure tools in place, and if they can manage to build something that also lets DMs build encounters? They will know a TON of info about our games. They might not read it right, or understand it completely, but it will be real data! They'll even be able to look at this data compared to say- internet noise... Does all that debate about CAGI actually pan out to people not choosing CAGI? Or do a majority of people still select that power despite all the internet anger? This thing has also just become a LOT more valuable to Wizards then it once was- which means they also now have a solid VALUE to show the people who control the purse strings. :) Were I another game company... I;d being paying close attention to how this thing pans out. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards getting character choice feedback from CB
Top