Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards not taking Gencon seriously?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6676790" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>I can't speak for them, but I think WOTC feels that Baldman Games already is their "official" presence at GenCon and that people come to GenCon just to play games. They buy all their books and stuff at their local gaming store instead. So, having a place to play adventures all weekend is enough of a presence for their game.</p><p></p><p>If this is going to be their ONLY presence, I would have like to have seen more adventures being offered so if you are a D&D fanatic you could have a different adventure to play almost every slot all weekend. Which means at least another 2 or 3 adventures. But I've been told that more adventures is a logistical nightmare. Plus, I don't think they have enough volunteer DMs anymore. Maybe if we grow 5e's popularity slightly and more people are willing to DM, we can see a bigger play area with more diverse adventures.</p><p></p><p>But I really don't think WOTC needs a huge booth. Especially when you walk into the booth and they say "We have nothing to sell or announce at this time." I'd rather the Q&A sessions they did instead.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No. None of that is really true. Running a 5e AL adventure doesn't really require much more out of a DM than running a LFR adventure did. IMHO, of course. You have to make a decision or two, but 95% of the work is done for you. The vast majority of the time the rules are fairly clear and don't require much interpretation.</p><p></p><p>Also, WOTC didn't abandon Con support. They stopped having a booth, but that was it. We got just as much support as ever. I know there were issues that people didn't like. Some people didn't like 4e at all. Some people didn't like the change in LFR rules that allowed players to create characters at higher levels. Some people just didn't like Essentials and felt it was an entirely new edition and got angry because of it. Whatever the reason, a bunch of people gave up on LFR and 4e and decided to volunteer for Paizo instead. Which left Baldman with a smaller supply of DMs.</p><p></p><p>I know that I played in some LFR 4e adventures at GenCon a couple of years ago and it was fairly apparent that they were scraping the bottom of the barrel for people who would DM at GenCon. One of our DMs admitted that he hated 4e, he never ran it at home and barely understood the rules in the middle of our game. He was tasked with running the Special at GenCon for high level characters. He made so many rules mistakes that the experience was less than enjoyable.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think it "requires" high quality DMs. Bad DMs were just as capable of ruining 4e adventures. I saw it on a regular basis. 5e certainly is NOT anti-consistent. The rules are clear on all the things that matter: How many spells you can cast per day, what you can do in a round of combat, what damage things do, how to calculate and roll skill checks. The rest is often clearly written in the adventure or is so logical it doesn't require rules for. It requires a DM to make real rulings maybe 5% of the time. Don't get me wrong, I know a couple of DMs that are so used to running 3e/3.5e/4e/Pathfinder that when that 5% of the time comes up they choke and get really frustrated and confused because they don't know what to do when the rules don't handle something. I've been at the table where the DM went on a tirade about how much they think WOTC broke the game because they didn't include rules for casting spells while swimming in acid.</p><p></p><p>I've let first time DMs run AL adventures at our local store and it went fine.</p><p></p><p>Epics also don't require much consistency either. They just require having a fun experience and a little bit more understanding of the complicated "flow" the adventure has.</p><p></p><p>The only real issues I heard about the Epic was that DMs couldn't hear the cues to move on to the next part because of a lack of speaker and spent a lot of time waiting when they should have been playing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6676790, member: 5143"] I can't speak for them, but I think WOTC feels that Baldman Games already is their "official" presence at GenCon and that people come to GenCon just to play games. They buy all their books and stuff at their local gaming store instead. So, having a place to play adventures all weekend is enough of a presence for their game. If this is going to be their ONLY presence, I would have like to have seen more adventures being offered so if you are a D&D fanatic you could have a different adventure to play almost every slot all weekend. Which means at least another 2 or 3 adventures. But I've been told that more adventures is a logistical nightmare. Plus, I don't think they have enough volunteer DMs anymore. Maybe if we grow 5e's popularity slightly and more people are willing to DM, we can see a bigger play area with more diverse adventures. But I really don't think WOTC needs a huge booth. Especially when you walk into the booth and they say "We have nothing to sell or announce at this time." I'd rather the Q&A sessions they did instead. No. None of that is really true. Running a 5e AL adventure doesn't really require much more out of a DM than running a LFR adventure did. IMHO, of course. You have to make a decision or two, but 95% of the work is done for you. The vast majority of the time the rules are fairly clear and don't require much interpretation. Also, WOTC didn't abandon Con support. They stopped having a booth, but that was it. We got just as much support as ever. I know there were issues that people didn't like. Some people didn't like 4e at all. Some people didn't like the change in LFR rules that allowed players to create characters at higher levels. Some people just didn't like Essentials and felt it was an entirely new edition and got angry because of it. Whatever the reason, a bunch of people gave up on LFR and 4e and decided to volunteer for Paizo instead. Which left Baldman with a smaller supply of DMs. I know that I played in some LFR 4e adventures at GenCon a couple of years ago and it was fairly apparent that they were scraping the bottom of the barrel for people who would DM at GenCon. One of our DMs admitted that he hated 4e, he never ran it at home and barely understood the rules in the middle of our game. He was tasked with running the Special at GenCon for high level characters. He made so many rules mistakes that the experience was less than enjoyable. I don't think it "requires" high quality DMs. Bad DMs were just as capable of ruining 4e adventures. I saw it on a regular basis. 5e certainly is NOT anti-consistent. The rules are clear on all the things that matter: How many spells you can cast per day, what you can do in a round of combat, what damage things do, how to calculate and roll skill checks. The rest is often clearly written in the adventure or is so logical it doesn't require rules for. It requires a DM to make real rulings maybe 5% of the time. Don't get me wrong, I know a couple of DMs that are so used to running 3e/3.5e/4e/Pathfinder that when that 5% of the time comes up they choke and get really frustrated and confused because they don't know what to do when the rules don't handle something. I've been at the table where the DM went on a tirade about how much they think WOTC broke the game because they didn't include rules for casting spells while swimming in acid. I've let first time DMs run AL adventures at our local store and it went fine. Epics also don't require much consistency either. They just require having a fun experience and a little bit more understanding of the complicated "flow" the adventure has. The only real issues I heard about the Epic was that DMs couldn't hear the cues to move on to the next part because of a lack of speaker and spent a lot of time waiting when they should have been playing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards not taking Gencon seriously?
Top