Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards Shouldn't Get Spells Automatically, A Modest Proposal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgoroth" data-source="post: 5943467" data-attributes="member: 6674889"><p><strong>it's</strong></p><p></p><p>easy to balance Invisibility, do it like Pathfinder did, make it 1 round or even 10 per level, rather than 24 hours like it was originally in AD&D. THAT was OP.</p><p></p><p>Improved Invis I never used it, because my DM made higher level spells insanely expensive. The only way I could get the spells I wanted, as an evoker in a hostile-to-magic realm (especially evocation magic), was the automatic 1 new spell per spell level. The rest of the cool utility ones I had a real hard time getting. THAT was fun...but having my entire class focus, evocation spells, to the DM, that would have taken it from "hard", to utter nonsense BS. fighters and paladins never needed to research new ways to fight, or roll a % die to see if they could swing a new sword they found. Their stuff just "works". I like hunting spells down...but not my class focus ones from my main school. </p><p></p><p>Automatic spells are one way to guarantee, regardless of DM fiat, that you can progress in your chosen school regardless of availability of magic. It was few and far between that we fought enemy spellcasters who had spellbooks I could copy from.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgoroth, post: 5943467, member: 6674889"] [b]it's[/b] easy to balance Invisibility, do it like Pathfinder did, make it 1 round or even 10 per level, rather than 24 hours like it was originally in AD&D. THAT was OP. Improved Invis I never used it, because my DM made higher level spells insanely expensive. The only way I could get the spells I wanted, as an evoker in a hostile-to-magic realm (especially evocation magic), was the automatic 1 new spell per spell level. The rest of the cool utility ones I had a real hard time getting. THAT was fun...but having my entire class focus, evocation spells, to the DM, that would have taken it from "hard", to utter nonsense BS. fighters and paladins never needed to research new ways to fight, or roll a % die to see if they could swing a new sword they found. Their stuff just "works". I like hunting spells down...but not my class focus ones from my main school. Automatic spells are one way to guarantee, regardless of DM fiat, that you can progress in your chosen school regardless of availability of magic. It was few and far between that we fought enemy spellcasters who had spellbooks I could copy from. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wizards Shouldn't Get Spells Automatically, A Modest Proposal
Top