Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards values the power of conditions and noncombat effects as virtual damage.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FallenRX" data-source="post: 9058868" data-attributes="member: 7033472"><p>So a long while ago i noticed something that was said by Jeremy crawford about monster design which is the fact they convert for matters of balance, things to virtual damage, via rating certain conditions equal to the power of certain spells levels of the condition appear.</p><p></p><p>You can see him say this <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0AkLGQ12I&t=2231s" target="_blank">here.</a></p><p></p><p>And ive come to realize, that is the exact same approach in the class design of the game, and the rogue playtest made it obvious.</p><p></p><p>For example.</p><p></p><p>The knockout ability of rogue which renders unconcious costs about 6d6 sneak attack, this is exactly 21 damage, which is about as strong as a second level spell, because unconcious is similar to paralyze which is also a second level spell.</p><p></p><p>Awe and obscure abilities in the rogue playtest which blinds/charms cost 3d6 which is an average of 11 damage, which is exactly the amount of the average damage of a 1st-level spell, where these conditions are directly inflicted on any creature easily. I even managed to recreate several condition based monster CR's using this method, with ease.</p><p></p><p>Basically conditions and the power they inflict are rated based on the values of the average damage of a spell level its closest too.</p><p></p><p>Looking at this example and point i think we can make a loose chart of how much they value conditons in the game.</p><p></p><p>Blinded. 11 Danage.(1st-level)</p><p>Charmed. 11 damage.(1st-level spell)</p><p>Frightened. 11 damage.(1st-level spell)</p><p>Grapple. 4 damage.(cantrip)</p><p>Incapacitated. 11 damage.(1st-level spell)</p><p>Invisible. 21 damage.(2nd-level spell)</p><p>Paralyzed. 21 damage(2nd-level spell)</p><p>Petrified. 55 damage(arguably 75 due to disintergrate).(6th-level spell)</p><p>Poisoned. 4 damage.(cantrip)</p><p>Restrained. 11 damage(1st-level)</p><p>Stunned. ???(best guess is about 13-16 damage)</p><p>Unconscious. 21 damage.(equal to paralyze)</p><p>Exhaustion. ???(best guess is about 11 damage looking at sickening radiance.).</p><p></p><p>This is a fascinating and weird find, that you can see directly replicated in the design of the current playtest rogue.</p><p></p><p>This also has huge implications for martial design.</p><p></p><p>They value the damage martials are doing as equal to the power of a spell level here.</p><p></p><p>Meaning that at 5th-level all martials consistently have around a second spell level of power at will in their eyes. Very wild way of thinking about this. And all abilities and effects in the game are seen through this lense.</p><p></p><p>It also comes with wilder implications which is that, classes are more balanced against each other more akin to calculating CR. Where it rates their Defensive value and offensive value thats average is calculated to hit a certain character level, where defensive power is calculated by translating everything into effective AC and HP, and offensive value is translated via Average DPR, and effective attack bonus per round. Meaning classes are probably balance more along the lines of them basically novaing using the most damage they can do on a single target via guarenteed damage using all of their abilities. If this is the case, that means resource management, is more about choosing went to use your nova or not use your nova, rather then anything else.</p><p></p><p>Its an interesting prospect here.</p><p></p><p>TL<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />R. They value conditions as virtual damage depending on the average damage of the spell level their value in power is close too. This is how they account for the power of conditions for not only monsters, but PC's as well. This may reflect that class power budgets are made not too unlike CR is for monsters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FallenRX, post: 9058868, member: 7033472"] So a long while ago i noticed something that was said by Jeremy crawford about monster design which is the fact they convert for matters of balance, things to virtual damage, via rating certain conditions equal to the power of certain spells levels of the condition appear. You can see him say this [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0AkLGQ12I&t=2231s']here.[/URL] And ive come to realize, that is the exact same approach in the class design of the game, and the rogue playtest made it obvious. For example. The knockout ability of rogue which renders unconcious costs about 6d6 sneak attack, this is exactly 21 damage, which is about as strong as a second level spell, because unconcious is similar to paralyze which is also a second level spell. Awe and obscure abilities in the rogue playtest which blinds/charms cost 3d6 which is an average of 11 damage, which is exactly the amount of the average damage of a 1st-level spell, where these conditions are directly inflicted on any creature easily. I even managed to recreate several condition based monster CR's using this method, with ease. Basically conditions and the power they inflict are rated based on the values of the average damage of a spell level its closest too. Looking at this example and point i think we can make a loose chart of how much they value conditons in the game. Blinded. 11 Danage.(1st-level) Charmed. 11 damage.(1st-level spell) Frightened. 11 damage.(1st-level spell) Grapple. 4 damage.(cantrip) Incapacitated. 11 damage.(1st-level spell) Invisible. 21 damage.(2nd-level spell) Paralyzed. 21 damage(2nd-level spell) Petrified. 55 damage(arguably 75 due to disintergrate).(6th-level spell) Poisoned. 4 damage.(cantrip) Restrained. 11 damage(1st-level) Stunned. ???(best guess is about 13-16 damage) Unconscious. 21 damage.(equal to paralyze) Exhaustion. ???(best guess is about 11 damage looking at sickening radiance.). This is a fascinating and weird find, that you can see directly replicated in the design of the current playtest rogue. This also has huge implications for martial design. They value the damage martials are doing as equal to the power of a spell level here. Meaning that at 5th-level all martials consistently have around a second spell level of power at will in their eyes. Very wild way of thinking about this. And all abilities and effects in the game are seen through this lense. It also comes with wilder implications which is that, classes are more balanced against each other more akin to calculating CR. Where it rates their Defensive value and offensive value thats average is calculated to hit a certain character level, where defensive power is calculated by translating everything into effective AC and HP, and offensive value is translated via Average DPR, and effective attack bonus per round. Meaning classes are probably balance more along the lines of them basically novaing using the most damage they can do on a single target via guarenteed damage using all of their abilities. If this is the case, that means resource management, is more about choosing went to use your nova or not use your nova, rather then anything else. Its an interesting prospect here. TL:DR. They value conditions as virtual damage depending on the average damage of the spell level their value in power is close too. This is how they account for the power of conditions for not only monsters, but PC's as well. This may reflect that class power budgets are made not too unlike CR is for monsters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wizards values the power of conditions and noncombat effects as virtual damage.
Top