Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bonedagger" data-source="post: 501812" data-attributes="member: 2564">I can remember Players Option giving it a try. Never had a chance to playtest it though.Their spellcost was as following:0 /1(0)1st /42nd /63rd /104th /155th /226th /307th /408th /509th /60But the real question in this case could then be if if being able to replace a 1st and 2nd level spell with a 3rd level is unbalancing. In the case where you would be able to replace one 9th for 10 2nd level it still limit you that casting 10 spells take a lot of time. Beside. The power of spells have a tendency to increase eksponetial [Edit: In this case casting time would be a big factor comparing a highlevel spell to many lowlevels for damage].The Players Option had a max on how many spells you could memorize per level. (So it was still a memorize and forget system. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />)Level/Max(Specialty)1st/2(3)2nd/2(3)3rd/3(4)4th/4(5)5th/4(6)6th/4(6)7th/5(6)etc.That way there could be no mass-use of lowlevel spells.However. I to also would like to hear more about Elements of Magics system.</blockquote>