Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Worlds and Monsters Art Gallery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keenath" data-source="post: 4064849" data-attributes="member: 59792"><p>Back in 2nd edition they had lots of landscapey sort of shots and lots of what I have to think of as "static action" images -- That is, the characters are engaged in some sort of activity, like fighting, but have no sense of kinetic energy.</p><p></p><p>If I may steal a few pics from that thread <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=208748" target="_blank">over there</a>, compare this Action Scene in 2nd edition...</p><p></p><p>[sblock]<img src="http://www.step.polymtl.ca/~coyote/picturesd/dragnlnc/lance10.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />[/sblock]</p><p></p><p>..to a late 3rd edition Action Scene.</p><p></p><p>[sblock]<img src="http://members.shaw.ca/infinity/Grenloke03s.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />[/sblock]</p><p></p><p>Those wizards don't look like they're in motion. Their cloaks and hair billow dramatically, but there's no sense of inertia to them. In the second, by comparison, you can almost feel the impact of that attack. They don't actually have to be in combat to feel it, though...</p><p></p><p>[sblock]<img src="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/roe_gallery/88265.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />[/sblock]</p><p></p><p>Even though she's not actually moving, it has a sense of energy that's lacking in the 2nd edition image.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, on the other hand (or really the same hand), I'm not a big fan of the "I'm a heavily armored fighter dude standing in front of a blank background!" art that I've seen a lot of in 3.x.</p><p></p><p>I suppose my wish would be to keep maybe 50% of the good 'action pose' art, and replace the rest with landscapes, using landscaped backgrounds for the "class example" art. Taking the R&C book, for example -- <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RacesNClasses_Gallery/111122.jpg" target="_blank">this</a> is far preferable to <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RacesNClasses_Gallery/111113.jpg" target="_blank">this</a>. I know sometimes you have to go with the unobtrusive background for page composition reasons, but I prefer the background that gives your characters some sense of place.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RulesComp_Gallery/97130.jpg" target="_blank">this dude</a> totally looks like Bruce Campbell. Maybe more like back in the Evil Dead or Hercules days than now, but we all get older.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keenath, post: 4064849, member: 59792"] Back in 2nd edition they had lots of landscapey sort of shots and lots of what I have to think of as "static action" images -- That is, the characters are engaged in some sort of activity, like fighting, but have no sense of kinetic energy. If I may steal a few pics from that thread [URL=http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=208748]over there[/URL], compare this Action Scene in 2nd edition... [sblock][img]http://www.step.polymtl.ca/~coyote/picturesd/dragnlnc/lance10.jpg[/img][/sblock] ..to a late 3rd edition Action Scene. [sblock][img]http://members.shaw.ca/infinity/Grenloke03s.jpg[/img][/sblock] Those wizards don't look like they're in motion. Their cloaks and hair billow dramatically, but there's no sense of inertia to them. In the second, by comparison, you can almost feel the impact of that attack. They don't actually have to be in combat to feel it, though... [sblock][IMG]http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/roe_gallery/88265.jpg[/IMG][/sblock] Even though she's not actually moving, it has a sense of energy that's lacking in the 2nd edition image. Now, on the other hand (or really the same hand), I'm not a big fan of the "I'm a heavily armored fighter dude standing in front of a blank background!" art that I've seen a lot of in 3.x. I suppose my wish would be to keep maybe 50% of the good 'action pose' art, and replace the rest with landscapes, using landscaped backgrounds for the "class example" art. Taking the R&C book, for example -- [URL=http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RacesNClasses_Gallery/111122.jpg]this[/URL] is far preferable to [URL=http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RacesNClasses_Gallery/111113.jpg]this[/URL]. I know sometimes you have to go with the unobtrusive background for page composition reasons, but I prefer the background that gives your characters some sense of place. Also, [URL=http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/RulesComp_Gallery/97130.jpg]this dude[/URL] totally looks like Bruce Campbell. Maybe more like back in the Evil Dead or Hercules days than now, but we all get older. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Worlds and Monsters Art Gallery
Top