Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="A'koss" data-source="post: 3982563" data-attributes="member: 840">I like a lot of what I'm hearing here.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Dragons - I love the fact that they steering them away from the stat abominations they were in 3e (I remember starting a post about this very thing a couple of years back). It looks like they're putting the monster back into the dragon.It's interesting that different dragons have different roles, even though they are solo monsters and therefore not generally found in entourages which would naturally fill out the other roles in an encounter.I like the removal of hard alignments but was quite surprised that they are pruning a couple of the metallics. Iron & Adamantine dragons? Sounds good t'me!Giants - We've heard most of this already, but I like the approach and it sounds like they will be closer to their mythological counterparts.Nice to see the few Greyhawk references they tossed in there...Feywild - I hate fae... moving on.Shadowfell: The Land of the Dead essentially. We can see what kinds of powers the new Necromancer will have (whenever it comes out). The Animus? *shrug* Okay...I'd like to know more about how Resurrection & Reincarnation work in 4e though, it's always been a big sticking point in my (and many others') games. And who are the Shadar-Kai again?</blockquote>

Verification