Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7769273" data-attributes="member: 16814">Okay, fine.&nbsp; Ignore that.&nbsp; Why do you feel tge need to defend the posting of an article that is dismissive of many readers and factually incorrect on the parts it's being dismissive about?&nbsp; So far, I've seen you say you like the articke because it doesn't sound like the usual, and that the argumentation being poor is a matter of taste.&nbsp; So, let's go with those as given:&nbsp; can you address why the article is good and valuable while being ignorant of it's subject and insulting in tone?Are you even aware of where these articles show ignorance of the subject matter?&nbsp; That's my biggest problem -- many have little or no experience with &quot;new school&quot; RPGs, and reading this article provides outright lies at worst and half-truths at best on the topic.&nbsp; I don't think lewpuls is being malicious, I just think he's ignorant.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7769273, member: 16814"] Okay, fine. Ignore that. Why do you feel tge need to defend the posting of an article that is dismissive of many readers and factually incorrect on the parts it's being dismissive about? So far, I've seen you say you like the articke because it doesn't sound like the usual, and that the argumentation being poor is a matter of taste. So, let's go with those as given: can you address why the article is good and valuable while being ignorant of it's subject and insulting in tone? Are you even aware of where these articles show ignorance of the subject matter? That's my biggest problem -- many have little or no experience with "new school" RPGs, and reading this article provides outright lies at worst and half-truths at best on the topic. I don't think lewpuls is being malicious, I just think he's ignorant. [/QUOTE]

Verification