Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: Gun vs. Sword
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jay Verkuilen" data-source="post: 7804060" data-attributes="member: 6873517"><p>Certainly, and the goal is not to simulate real combat at all, generally, but heroic genre fiction. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure I agree with either point. Mid 19th Century rifled muskets were indeed quite deadly but the rifle bullets designed in the late 19th Century smokeless powder era were roughly designed to replicate their performance, albeit with a smaller bullet needed due to the massively increased performance of smokeless powder. The ballistics are markedly different, with ACW muskets being slow with heavy bullets and a smokeless powder rifle (e.g,. a Lee-Enfield or Mauser) being much faster. There were marked improvements to the bullets in the early 19th Century, as well. </p><p></p><p>One big reason to downsize from 7.62mm to 5.56mm was to allow an infantryman to carry a lot of ammo---recall they're usually carrying belts of machine-gun ammo and/or mortar rounds. The real killer on the modern battlefield was judged to be artillery and crew-served weapons like the machine-gun or mortar, with the role of the infantry rifle being primarily for suppression and defense of these. </p><p> </p><p>I suspect the notion that modern military weapons are <em>designed</em> to wound is rather an urban legend but I'd definitely like for someone who has expertise to comment. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed, and in my still running after all these years 2E game guns feature prominently. I have some classics of the era: The PC who's most into them indeed has several pistols and I've let him take his end of round attack with a pistol if he wants so as to encourage his use; he's going to get a clockwork pistol soon. Enemies often have a team of a shooter and one or more loaders. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>AFAIK, machine-guns are rarely used in sustained fire, although during World War I that happened at times with the water-cooled machine-guns of the time. Generally speaking, they're used in short, controlled bursts to prevent the barrel from overheating and to avoid wasting ammo. If you dump a 100 round belt through a modern general purpose machine-gun you'll waste most of the ammo and hasten the demise of the barrel.</p><p></p><p>As to the relevance of archers, I often abstract a horde of archers as a Dex save of some sort so I can avoid having to deal with targeting or rolling all those dice, so if there were a lot of rapid fire weapons I'd do the same thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jay Verkuilen, post: 7804060, member: 6873517"] Certainly, and the goal is not to simulate real combat at all, generally, but heroic genre fiction. I'm not sure I agree with either point. Mid 19th Century rifled muskets were indeed quite deadly but the rifle bullets designed in the late 19th Century smokeless powder era were roughly designed to replicate their performance, albeit with a smaller bullet needed due to the massively increased performance of smokeless powder. The ballistics are markedly different, with ACW muskets being slow with heavy bullets and a smokeless powder rifle (e.g,. a Lee-Enfield or Mauser) being much faster. There were marked improvements to the bullets in the early 19th Century, as well. One big reason to downsize from 7.62mm to 5.56mm was to allow an infantryman to carry a lot of ammo---recall they're usually carrying belts of machine-gun ammo and/or mortar rounds. The real killer on the modern battlefield was judged to be artillery and crew-served weapons like the machine-gun or mortar, with the role of the infantry rifle being primarily for suppression and defense of these. I suspect the notion that modern military weapons are [I]designed[/I] to wound is rather an urban legend but I'd definitely like for someone who has expertise to comment. Indeed, and in my still running after all these years 2E game guns feature prominently. I have some classics of the era: The PC who's most into them indeed has several pistols and I've let him take his end of round attack with a pistol if he wants so as to encourage his use; he's going to get a clockwork pistol soon. Enemies often have a team of a shooter and one or more loaders. AFAIK, machine-guns are rarely used in sustained fire, although during World War I that happened at times with the water-cooled machine-guns of the time. Generally speaking, they're used in short, controlled bursts to prevent the barrel from overheating and to avoid wasting ammo. If you dump a 100 round belt through a modern general purpose machine-gun you'll waste most of the ammo and hasten the demise of the barrel. As to the relevance of archers, I often abstract a horde of archers as a Dex save of some sort so I can avoid having to deal with targeting or rolling all those dice, so if there were a lot of rapid fire weapons I'd do the same thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: Gun vs. Sword
Top