Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Worlds of Design: How Lethal is Your Magic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lewpuls" data-source="post: 9458321" data-attributes="member: 30518"><p>The lethality of a RPG's spell system has repercussions beyond combat.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]379843[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://pixabay.com/illustrations/wizard-fantasy-magic-mystery-4417511/" target="_blank">Picture courtesy of Pixabay.</a></p><h3>Meet the Spellslingers</h3><p>I recently read the novel <a href="https://spellslinger.fandom.com/wiki/Spellslinger_(Series)" target="_blank"><strong><em>Spellslinger</em></strong> (and successors) by Sebastian de Castell</a>. In this story novice spellcasters (adolescents about to take the “tests”) can kill one or more people with magic quickly and easily, provided they are not afraid or in pain. And they have <strong>lots</strong> of spells. Not surprisingly, their “tribe” tends to dominate in international affairs.</p><p></p><p>This lethality of novice/low level magic users is not what I’m used to from older versions of <strong><em>Dungeons & Dragons</em></strong>, where they’re not exactly harmless, but not very dangerous. <em>Magic missile</em> can sometimes kill an ordinary person, but most low-level spells do little damage. That changes drastically around fifth level, when “artillery spells” (e.g., <em>fireball, lightning bolt</em>) are added to the mix. Ordinary people, and some adventurers, fail to survive one such blast. The two spells also become important in small battles (in large battles, they have much less effect barring “unlimited ammo” such as a fully charged wand).</p><p></p><p>How does that influence the view of NPCs in the campaign world and, by proxy, the game overall?</p><h3>What Makes a Spell Lethal?</h3><p>We should always keep in mind that spells can benefit society without affecting combat, but <strong>lethal</strong> spells are, well, deadly. Lethality must include consideration of how fast it happens, and how easily a spell is nullified by attacks, and other conditions. This varies greatly from one rule set to another. Even within different editions of D&D, tactics have changed when available spell lists were modified from one edition to another. If you want to have characters to choose non-violent means of settling disagreements in an RPG, you might need to reduce the lethality of magic.</p><h3>Spells Grouped by Lethality</h3><p>Thinking about all of this, I decided to try to group spells according to their uses, in the glaring light of lethality. Someone has surely thought about this at much greater length than I have, and categorized spells in terms of what they do for their society as well as for their wielders, but here are my categories:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Battle. </strong>Here we have spells that make a difference in full-scale battles (as opposed to the skirmishes typical of FRPGs). These might include information gathering/reconnaissance spells, mass area of effect spells including the proverbial <em>fireball</em>, spells that obscure vision, and many others. Many of the old D&D spells are of this type, perhaps not surprising insofar as D&D derives from the <strong><em>Chainmail</em></strong> miniatures battle rules. These spells will sometimes be lethal, though spells that assist the general in some way (such as the obscuration spells) may be more common than the spells that kill.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Buffs.</strong> These are spells that help temporarily improve the capability of someone. This needn’t be only in combat terms of course. A spell that gives you increased stamina when you’re on a long walking trip would be very welcome. This kind of spell could lead to lethality depending on what the buffer is and how it’s used, but there’s no lethality inherent in the category.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Communication. </strong>These are spells that help a governor or the noble ruler of a domain, whether the domain is a town or a castle or an entire county or country. Crystal ball spells might fall into this category. Communication spells might make a big difference, compared with the slow communication of historical settings.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Convenience. </strong>These spells that take care of everyday chores, like the enchanted mop mopping the floor from <strong><em>Sorcerer’s Apprentice</em>. </strong>There is no lethality at all in this kind of spell (other than pure accident, as in drowning!).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Skirmish</strong>. These are the spells that are often used in skirmishes that occur during RPG adventures. Some of these will be lethal. But I think of <em>web</em> and <em>stinking cloud</em>, in particular, big influences that are rarely lethal.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Other Categories. </strong>Information Gathering could be a category, though such spells are included in the other categories. And there are others such as Transformational spells. But I wanted to focus on lethality.</li> </ul><p>GM’s can affect lethality by tweaking how spells work, their frequency, and their accessibility (e.g. banning <em>fireball</em> and <em>lightning bolt</em> or interpreting spell descriptions in less lethal ways). But the rule set will normally have greater influence.</p><h3>Why This Matters</h3><p>Lethality is an abstraction, but the longer magic wielders have been around in the world, the more likely their presence will influence how people treat spells. If any arcane caster can eventually gain access to <em>fireball</em> or <em>lightning bolt</em>, every caster, novice or otherwise, might be treated with more or less respect according to their levels of lethality. If magic is wild and unknown, where spell lists and acquisition of spells are a mystery, casters might be broadly grouped into one of the above types (“hedge wizards” for convenience, battlecasters for battle spells, etc.), which will undoubtedly affect how they interact with society at large. And of course, once those assumptions are in place, people will act accordingly, targeting battlecasters out of fear of what they might do, or asking hedge wizards for help assuming that all casters can communicate across distances.</p><p></p><p>What’s unlikely in games like <strong><em>Dungeons & Dragons</em></strong> with codified spell systems is that anyone is surprised when someone casts a spell. Understanding a spell system as a player and as a character are different things, and the interplay of the two can spell the difference between every archer aiming for the guy in robes … or running in fear as soon as he casts <em>magic missile.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Your Turn: How much do your societies understand the lethality of magic in your game setting?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lewpuls, post: 9458321, member: 30518"] The lethality of a RPG's spell system has repercussions beyond combat. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="howlethalisyourmagic.jpg"]379843[/ATTACH] [URL='https://pixabay.com/illustrations/wizard-fantasy-magic-mystery-4417511/']Picture courtesy of Pixabay.[/URL][/CENTER] [HEADING=2]Meet the Spellslingers[/HEADING] I recently read the novel [URL='https://spellslinger.fandom.com/wiki/Spellslinger_(Series)'][B][I]Spellslinger[/I][/B] (and successors) by Sebastian de Castell[/URL]. In this story novice spellcasters (adolescents about to take the “tests”) can kill one or more people with magic quickly and easily, provided they are not afraid or in pain. And they have [B]lots[/B] of spells. Not surprisingly, their “tribe” tends to dominate in international affairs. This lethality of novice/low level magic users is not what I’m used to from older versions of [B][I]Dungeons & Dragons[/I][/B], where they’re not exactly harmless, but not very dangerous. [I]Magic missile[/I] can sometimes kill an ordinary person, but most low-level spells do little damage. That changes drastically around fifth level, when “artillery spells” (e.g., [I]fireball, lightning bolt[/I]) are added to the mix. Ordinary people, and some adventurers, fail to survive one such blast. The two spells also become important in small battles (in large battles, they have much less effect barring “unlimited ammo” such as a fully charged wand). How does that influence the view of NPCs in the campaign world and, by proxy, the game overall? [HEADING=2]What Makes a Spell Lethal?[/HEADING] We should always keep in mind that spells can benefit society without affecting combat, but [B]lethal[/B] spells are, well, deadly. Lethality must include consideration of how fast it happens, and how easily a spell is nullified by attacks, and other conditions. This varies greatly from one rule set to another. Even within different editions of D&D, tactics have changed when available spell lists were modified from one edition to another. If you want to have characters to choose non-violent means of settling disagreements in an RPG, you might need to reduce the lethality of magic. [HEADING=2]Spells Grouped by Lethality[/HEADING] Thinking about all of this, I decided to try to group spells according to their uses, in the glaring light of lethality. Someone has surely thought about this at much greater length than I have, and categorized spells in terms of what they do for their society as well as for their wielders, but here are my categories: [LIST] [*][B]Battle. [/B]Here we have spells that make a difference in full-scale battles (as opposed to the skirmishes typical of FRPGs). These might include information gathering/reconnaissance spells, mass area of effect spells including the proverbial [I]fireball[/I], spells that obscure vision, and many others. Many of the old D&D spells are of this type, perhaps not surprising insofar as D&D derives from the [B][I]Chainmail[/I][/B] miniatures battle rules. These spells will sometimes be lethal, though spells that assist the general in some way (such as the obscuration spells) may be more common than the spells that kill. [*][B]Buffs.[/B] These are spells that help temporarily improve the capability of someone. This needn’t be only in combat terms of course. A spell that gives you increased stamina when you’re on a long walking trip would be very welcome. This kind of spell could lead to lethality depending on what the buffer is and how it’s used, but there’s no lethality inherent in the category. [*][B]Communication. [/B]These are spells that help a governor or the noble ruler of a domain, whether the domain is a town or a castle or an entire county or country. Crystal ball spells might fall into this category. Communication spells might make a big difference, compared with the slow communication of historical settings. [*][B]Convenience. [/B]These spells that take care of everyday chores, like the enchanted mop mopping the floor from [B][I]Sorcerer’s Apprentice[/I]. [/B]There is no lethality at all in this kind of spell (other than pure accident, as in drowning!). [*][B]Skirmish[/B]. These are the spells that are often used in skirmishes that occur during RPG adventures. Some of these will be lethal. But I think of [I]web[/I] and [I]stinking cloud[/I], in particular, big influences that are rarely lethal. [*][B]Other Categories. [/B]Information Gathering could be a category, though such spells are included in the other categories. And there are others such as Transformational spells. But I wanted to focus on lethality. [/LIST] GM’s can affect lethality by tweaking how spells work, their frequency, and their accessibility (e.g. banning [I]fireball[/I] and [I]lightning bolt[/I] or interpreting spell descriptions in less lethal ways). But the rule set will normally have greater influence. [HEADING=2]Why This Matters[/HEADING] Lethality is an abstraction, but the longer magic wielders have been around in the world, the more likely their presence will influence how people treat spells. If any arcane caster can eventually gain access to [I]fireball[/I] or [I]lightning bolt[/I], every caster, novice or otherwise, might be treated with more or less respect according to their levels of lethality. If magic is wild and unknown, where spell lists and acquisition of spells are a mystery, casters might be broadly grouped into one of the above types (“hedge wizards” for convenience, battlecasters for battle spells, etc.), which will undoubtedly affect how they interact with society at large. And of course, once those assumptions are in place, people will act accordingly, targeting battlecasters out of fear of what they might do, or asking hedge wizards for help assuming that all casters can communicate across distances. What’s unlikely in games like [B][I]Dungeons & Dragons[/I][/B] with codified spell systems is that anyone is surprised when someone casts a spell. Understanding a spell system as a player and as a character are different things, and the interplay of the two can spell the difference between every archer aiming for the guy in robes … or running in fear as soon as he casts [I]magic missile.[/I] [B]Your Turn: How much do your societies understand the lethality of magic in your game setting?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Worlds of Design: How Lethal is Your Magic?
Top