Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: Story vs. Gameplay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lewpuls" data-source="post: 9797810" data-attributes="member: 30518"><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]421898[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://pixabay.com/photos/bones-dice-for-games-blanket-book-2395135/" target="_blank">Picture courtesy of Pixabay.</a></p><h3>Which Comes First?</h3><p>This is an age-old question in the realm of game design: Which element takes precedence—the narrative arc of the story, or the functional constraints and mechanisms of the gameplay? We must consider this question from two perspectives: which comes first in the design process, and which is more important for the final version of the game? For an established adventure, the gameplay is largely predetermined by the ruleset, but for designing an entire game from the ground up, the choice of starting point fundamentally alters the outcome.</p><p></p><p>When tackling game design, it’s a common mistake for newcomers to begin with a rich story. When I taught game development (now retired), and I asked beginners to write a treatment for a game (a brief description of a game, a few pages), they wrote about a story. They didn't have a game at all, because they hadn't thought about how the mechanisms of the game might support their story.</p><p></p><p>Ernest W. Adams, founder of the <a href="https://igda.org/" target="_blank">International Game Developers' Association (IGDA)</a>, argues strongly against this approach:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Starting with the story is appealing because it is creatively easy and fun, but it often leads to a substantial investment of time and money before determining if the game is actually enjoyable to play. In essence, a strong narrative without a fun mechanical core is not a game at all; it's just a treatment.</p><h3><strong>Mechanisms Define the Game</strong></h3><p>A game, fundamentally, is a set of mechanisms that provide constraints which players must follow. Whether these constraints are built into the code of a video game or written into the rules of a tabletop game (where a GM usually enforces them), they are the necessary engine of action. While a few genre-specific video games might prioritize "experience" over mechanism, true game design is not equivalent to writing a story. What happens in a game may resemble a story, but that is the <em>result</em> of the mechanics, not the starting point.</p><p></p><p>This mechanical-first approach is supported by industry veterans like <strong>Mark Maratea</strong>, <a href="https://www.quora.com/profile/Mark-Maratea" target="_blank">Technical Director and Software Architect for AAA and mobile games</a>:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This 1% of story is vital because it determines foundational decisions: <em>Is the game about combat? Are the enemies bipedal or flying? Is it 1st or 3rd person?</em> These mechanical questions must be answered before a full story can be properly supported.</p><h3><strong>Player Agency vs. Designer’s Story</strong></h3><p>Ultimately, the goal of a game designer is to design a <em>game</em>, not write a story. As Adams notes:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If players only wanted story, they would watch television. In the final design, prioritizing story severely limits replayability, as players "beat the game" and move on. More significantly, a dominant, built-in narrative can alienate "serious" players by reducing their agency—<a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/worlds-of-design-the-tyranny-and-freedom-of-player-agency.666600/" target="_blank">their ability to make a significant difference in the outcome</a>.</p><h3><strong>Game First, Context Second</strong></h3><p>While there are many excellent, small-scale RPGs that are based on specific, story-heavy situations, the "big" tentpole RPGs—the ones designed for enduring, long-term play—invariably prioritize the gameplay mechanisms first, even if they are situated within a rich setting. What matters in the end is the designer’s intent, but the most enduring titles are those where the mechanics are solid enough to let the players write their own story.</p><p></p><p><strong>Your Turn: Do you prefer to play specific-scenario RPGs, or the “big” ones that let you attach your own setting/stories to it?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lewpuls, post: 9797810, member: 30518"] [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="the-bones-2395135_960_720.jpg"]421898[/ATTACH] [URL='https://pixabay.com/photos/bones-dice-for-games-blanket-book-2395135/']Picture courtesy of Pixabay.[/URL][/CENTER] [HEADING=2]Which Comes First?[/HEADING] This is an age-old question in the realm of game design: Which element takes precedence—the narrative arc of the story, or the functional constraints and mechanisms of the gameplay? We must consider this question from two perspectives: which comes first in the design process, and which is more important for the final version of the game? For an established adventure, the gameplay is largely predetermined by the ruleset, but for designing an entire game from the ground up, the choice of starting point fundamentally alters the outcome. When tackling game design, it’s a common mistake for newcomers to begin with a rich story. When I taught game development (now retired), and I asked beginners to write a treatment for a game (a brief description of a game, a few pages), they wrote about a story. They didn't have a game at all, because they hadn't thought about how the mechanisms of the game might support their story. Ernest W. Adams, founder of the [URL='https://igda.org/']International Game Developers' Association (IGDA)[/URL], argues strongly against this approach: Starting with the story is appealing because it is creatively easy and fun, but it often leads to a substantial investment of time and money before determining if the game is actually enjoyable to play. In essence, a strong narrative without a fun mechanical core is not a game at all; it's just a treatment. [HEADING=2][B]Mechanisms Define the Game[/B][/HEADING] A game, fundamentally, is a set of mechanisms that provide constraints which players must follow. Whether these constraints are built into the code of a video game or written into the rules of a tabletop game (where a GM usually enforces them), they are the necessary engine of action. While a few genre-specific video games might prioritize "experience" over mechanism, true game design is not equivalent to writing a story. What happens in a game may resemble a story, but that is the [I]result[/I] of the mechanics, not the starting point. This mechanical-first approach is supported by industry veterans like [B]Mark Maratea[/B], [URL='https://www.quora.com/profile/Mark-Maratea']Technical Director and Software Architect for AAA and mobile games[/URL]: This 1% of story is vital because it determines foundational decisions: [I]Is the game about combat? Are the enemies bipedal or flying? Is it 1st or 3rd person?[/I] These mechanical questions must be answered before a full story can be properly supported. [HEADING=2][B]Player Agency vs. Designer’s Story[/B][/HEADING] Ultimately, the goal of a game designer is to design a [I]game[/I], not write a story. As Adams notes: If players only wanted story, they would watch television. In the final design, prioritizing story severely limits replayability, as players "beat the game" and move on. More significantly, a dominant, built-in narrative can alienate "serious" players by reducing their agency—[URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/worlds-of-design-the-tyranny-and-freedom-of-player-agency.666600/']their ability to make a significant difference in the outcome[/URL]. [HEADING=2][B]Game First, Context Second[/B][/HEADING] While there are many excellent, small-scale RPGs that are based on specific, story-heavy situations, the "big" tentpole RPGs—the ones designed for enduring, long-term play—invariably prioritize the gameplay mechanisms first, even if they are situated within a rich setting. What matters in the end is the designer’s intent, but the most enduring titles are those where the mechanics are solid enough to let the players write their own story. [B]Your Turn: Do you prefer to play specific-scenario RPGs, or the “big” ones that let you attach your own setting/stories to it?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: Story vs. Gameplay
Top