Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Chain of Imagination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lewpuls" data-source="post: 8103327" data-attributes="member: 30518"><p>In this article I try to rank forms of entertainment, including tabletop games, in how much imagination is needed and why they don’t always translate across different types of media.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]127061[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://pixabay.com/photos/old-record-video-film-shop-decor-4642424/" target="_blank">Picture courtesy of Pixabay.</a></p><p></p><p>Tabletop RPGs rely heavily on imagination, and many video game genres derive from tabletop RPGs. Video games today are able to supply much of the look and feel that you can't do on the tabletop. I've ranked various forms of entertainment according to how much imagination is required to enjoy those forms, from least to most.</p><p></p><p>We’re defining imagination here in the context of how much mental power is expended to fill in the blanks of an experience. The less senses used to enjoy the experience, the more imagination is needed to enjoy it (see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_richness_theory" target="_blank">Media Richness Theory</a> for another example of how media can be ranked). This is a generalized list, with which you can find individual exceptions. Remember “no generalization is always true, not even this one.”</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Movies</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Video games</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Typical videos</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Stage plays</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LARPs</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Comics</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Audio presentation</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Tabletop board and card games</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Tabletop RPGs</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Oral storytelling</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Novels</li> </ol><p>The first group of media include both audio and visual components. The one that requires the least imagination is <strong>movies </strong>because everything is there for you to see and hear, and of course in 3-D even more so. Next is <strong>video games.</strong> They're not quite as detailed as movies if only because the rendering times have to be immediate or close to it, whereas a movie will render overnight or even longer in order to provide the detail you see. The next level where you need a little more imagination is <strong>typical videos</strong>, such as videos on YouTube.</p><p></p><p>Next are <strong>stage plays</strong> and any sort of interactive theater, which more media richness. This includes live action role-playing or <strong>LARPs</strong> where people with foam or rattan swords are fighting each other, and where there are other props. You do it live; you don’t just sit around a table. If a character can touch you or you can your sense of smell is engaged (like a musty smell of a room, or sitting on a chair that characters in the play use), that elevates the stage play beyond other visual mediums. Conversely, stage plays have little in the way of special effects, but it’s mostly there in front of you.</p><p></p><p>Then we get to visual-only mediums like <strong>comic strips and books</strong>, or as some people prefer “graphic novels.” You have individual panels, and you have to imagine everything that connects those panels together. The book <em>Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art</em> (by Scott McLoud) explains this immensely well and in comic book form. Conversely, <strong>audio presentations</strong> such as the original <em>Hitchhikers Guide</em> require even more imagination. You get dialogue and sound effects but nothing visual.</p><p></p><p><strong>Tabletop board and card games</strong> provide visuals without much movement, without dialogue, without sound, so they require even more imagination in some respects than audio presentations, but could be ranked above rather than below the latter.</p><p></p><p>Next is <strong>RPGs </strong>and <strong>oral storytelling.</strong> Although related to audio presentations, RPGs and oral storytelling are more fluid than static presentations. When all you have is the spoken word (and perhaps some minor props for RPGs), both GM and players must use a lot of imagination. Being a good storyteller, as at the proverbial campfire, no props or rules at all, requires significant imaginative engagement from both the game master and the other participants.</p><p></p><p>Finally we get to <strong>novels</strong> (and shorter stories) where it's all text, and the author has no feedback the way an oral storyteller does. The author has to try to paint the scene in words. That takes a lot of imagination both from author and from reader, and maybe it's one reason why many people don't read much anymore. Look at the ubiquity of the acronym “tl;dr” (too long; didn’t read). Short stories I think take a little more imagination because the author doesn't use so many words to describe what's going on. Of course, some authors are very descriptive and some are not, that's just the author’s style.</p><p></p><p>The differences in these forms of media becomes apparent when we try to move from one to another; for example, turning a movie setting into a role-playing game, or writing a novel based on a tabletop campaign. It’s not as simple as just writing down what happened, or telling players to follow the exact path of a movie plot. The difference is choice: more restrictive mediums lead the participant, while more imaginative mediums leave it open. This is just one reason that making a proper D&D movie is so challenging.</p><p></p><p>In my opinion, entertainment that requires less imagination has become ascendant. This is problematic because imagination atrophies from lack of use. Is this atrophy of player imagination bad? I don't presume to judge, but I certainly think it’s unfortunate.</p><p></p><p><strong>Your turn: How would you sort media by imagination?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lewpuls, post: 8103327, member: 30518"] In this article I try to rank forms of entertainment, including tabletop games, in how much imagination is needed and why they don’t always translate across different types of media. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="old-record-video-film-shop-4642424_1280.jpg"]127061[/ATTACH] [URL='https://pixabay.com/photos/old-record-video-film-shop-decor-4642424/']Picture courtesy of Pixabay.[/URL][/CENTER] Tabletop RPGs rely heavily on imagination, and many video game genres derive from tabletop RPGs. Video games today are able to supply much of the look and feel that you can't do on the tabletop. I've ranked various forms of entertainment according to how much imagination is required to enjoy those forms, from least to most. We’re defining imagination here in the context of how much mental power is expended to fill in the blanks of an experience. The less senses used to enjoy the experience, the more imagination is needed to enjoy it (see [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_richness_theory']Media Richness Theory[/URL] for another example of how media can be ranked). This is a generalized list, with which you can find individual exceptions. Remember “no generalization is always true, not even this one.” [LIST=1] [*]Movies [*]Video games [*]Typical videos [*]Stage plays [*]LARPs [*]Comics [*]Audio presentation [*]Tabletop board and card games [*]Tabletop RPGs [*]Oral storytelling [*]Novels [/LIST] The first group of media include both audio and visual components. The one that requires the least imagination is [B]movies [/B]because everything is there for you to see and hear, and of course in 3-D even more so. Next is [B]video games.[/B] They're not quite as detailed as movies if only because the rendering times have to be immediate or close to it, whereas a movie will render overnight or even longer in order to provide the detail you see. The next level where you need a little more imagination is [B]typical videos[/B], such as videos on YouTube. Next are [B]stage plays[/B] and any sort of interactive theater, which more media richness. This includes live action role-playing or [B]LARPs[/B] where people with foam or rattan swords are fighting each other, and where there are other props. You do it live; you don’t just sit around a table. If a character can touch you or you can your sense of smell is engaged (like a musty smell of a room, or sitting on a chair that characters in the play use), that elevates the stage play beyond other visual mediums. Conversely, stage plays have little in the way of special effects, but it’s mostly there in front of you. Then we get to visual-only mediums like [B]comic strips and books[/B], or as some people prefer “graphic novels.” You have individual panels, and you have to imagine everything that connects those panels together. The book [I]Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art[/I] (by Scott McLoud) explains this immensely well and in comic book form. Conversely, [B]audio presentations[/B] such as the original [I]Hitchhikers Guide[/I] require even more imagination. You get dialogue and sound effects but nothing visual. [B]Tabletop board and card games[/B] provide visuals without much movement, without dialogue, without sound, so they require even more imagination in some respects than audio presentations, but could be ranked above rather than below the latter. Next is [B]RPGs [/B]and [B]oral storytelling.[/B] Although related to audio presentations, RPGs and oral storytelling are more fluid than static presentations. When all you have is the spoken word (and perhaps some minor props for RPGs), both GM and players must use a lot of imagination. Being a good storyteller, as at the proverbial campfire, no props or rules at all, requires significant imaginative engagement from both the game master and the other participants. Finally we get to [B]novels[/B] (and shorter stories) where it's all text, and the author has no feedback the way an oral storyteller does. The author has to try to paint the scene in words. That takes a lot of imagination both from author and from reader, and maybe it's one reason why many people don't read much anymore. Look at the ubiquity of the acronym “tl;dr” (too long; didn’t read). Short stories I think take a little more imagination because the author doesn't use so many words to describe what's going on. Of course, some authors are very descriptive and some are not, that's just the author’s style. The differences in these forms of media becomes apparent when we try to move from one to another; for example, turning a movie setting into a role-playing game, or writing a novel based on a tabletop campaign. It’s not as simple as just writing down what happened, or telling players to follow the exact path of a movie plot. The difference is choice: more restrictive mediums lead the participant, while more imaginative mediums leave it open. This is just one reason that making a proper D&D movie is so challenging. In my opinion, entertainment that requires less imagination has become ascendant. This is problematic because imagination atrophies from lack of use. Is this atrophy of player imagination bad? I don't presume to judge, but I certainly think it’s unfortunate. [B]Your turn: How would you sort media by imagination?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Chain of Imagination
Top