Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Problem with Space Navies, Part 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9730572" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>There might be some idea that humanity is slowly developping the idea that genociding your neighbour is no longer as good an idea as we collectively thought until recently. If space conflicts are to happen in the future, one could very well envision that sending a low cost planet-killer on Planet 223, wiping out billions of civilians, will not fly with your population of your own Planet, 221. Sure, maybe not all cultures right now are adhering yet to the idea that genocide is bad, but we have some time left before we colonize other planets. Progress has been made since Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant. I am not sure the Rebel Alliance would have said "hey, there is an easy solution to the Palpatine problem, let's send an asteroid on Coruscant" in 15 BBY, despite all of the founding planets having the capability to do that. Same during the Clone Wars. We use droids, or clones, not real persons, and that's the "worst" we'll do, even if the Trade Federation could easily have wiped Coruscant (again...) for sending in a pair of Jedi to meddle with their trade negociation with Naboo. Their own public opinion wouldn't have approved that. And then Tarkin uses the Death Star, showing that he doesn't care about the equilibrium. Still, no wiping of Coruscant.</p><p></p><p>I am not convinced the argument would be as strong with alien species. We have a history of eradicating species on a daily basis without a qualm, and the trend doesn't seem to slow. Unless we're fighting cute space kittens, species removal would certainly be on the table. In this case, acknowledging that kinetic impactors are MAD and banning them in a Geneva-convention like treaty, possibly proposed to any civilization that can develop spacefaring outside its system. "Hello, nice to meet you. We've noticed that it is your first hyperspace jump. Kudos to your species. Now, please sign this treaty renouncing the use of planet-busting tech or all the signatories will immediately wipe your civilization out with planet-busting tech."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9730572, member: 42856"] There might be some idea that humanity is slowly developping the idea that genociding your neighbour is no longer as good an idea as we collectively thought until recently. If space conflicts are to happen in the future, one could very well envision that sending a low cost planet-killer on Planet 223, wiping out billions of civilians, will not fly with your population of your own Planet, 221. Sure, maybe not all cultures right now are adhering yet to the idea that genocide is bad, but we have some time left before we colonize other planets. Progress has been made since Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant. I am not sure the Rebel Alliance would have said "hey, there is an easy solution to the Palpatine problem, let's send an asteroid on Coruscant" in 15 BBY, despite all of the founding planets having the capability to do that. Same during the Clone Wars. We use droids, or clones, not real persons, and that's the "worst" we'll do, even if the Trade Federation could easily have wiped Coruscant (again...) for sending in a pair of Jedi to meddle with their trade negociation with Naboo. Their own public opinion wouldn't have approved that. And then Tarkin uses the Death Star, showing that he doesn't care about the equilibrium. Still, no wiping of Coruscant. I am not convinced the argument would be as strong with alien species. We have a history of eradicating species on a daily basis without a qualm, and the trend doesn't seem to slow. Unless we're fighting cute space kittens, species removal would certainly be on the table. In this case, acknowledging that kinetic impactors are MAD and banning them in a Geneva-convention like treaty, possibly proposed to any civilization that can develop spacefaring outside its system. "Hello, nice to meet you. We've noticed that it is your first hyperspace jump. Kudos to your species. Now, please sign this treaty renouncing the use of planet-busting tech or all the signatories will immediately wipe your civilization out with planet-busting tech." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worlds of Design: The Problem with Space Navies, Part 1
Top