Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 9463824" data-attributes="member: 20564">Please don't try to put words in my mouth.  It's both insulting and wrong.  A story comes from play at the table, not from a DM.I do have to adjust to the characters actions as they can go in so many directions that don't match with what is envisioned before play or introduction of the characters.  As I've mentioned before, not a single module out there would have dealt with the splitting of the Fellowship in LotR - an adventure is gravely affects by the characters in it, and by their choices.  Another part of editing is to align with player interest; I would build up or diminish parts of an adventure to match.  If the players are intrigued by 'this part' that isn't particularly fleshed out, and not engaged with 'that subplot', I can enhance the first at the cost of the second, and my table will have more fun."There is no need to make numerous in-game adjustments to published adventures." -- Wow.  This is trivially shown to be incorrect.  Go on Reddit, look for numerous reworks of all of WotCs 5e adventures.  Filling in plot holes, correcting problems with scenes and encounters, making things hang together, fixing maps, adding missing connective areas.  There is a huge amount of stuff out there because there is absolutely a need to make adjustment to published adventures.</blockquote>