Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worried about new minis?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 826783" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p>I thought about it for a while and I can see the merit of your point guys, more than any other point brought up so far. But there's a catch to it that you might not have thought about.</p><p></p><p>Most people don't want a digester so when they get it they still don't want it. So they sell it on the secondary market to someone who does.</p><p></p><p>ie. WotC is going to make <strong>more</strong> of a product (digester mini's in this example) that the majority of people <strong>don't</strong> want and they're going to sell it sight-unseen to people who don't want it. That's not a selling point for me.</p><p></p><p>Why not just make the mini's that are less in demand "order from our website only" or some other form of direct delivery that reduces the main expense of the product: distribution?</p><p></p><p>There is no advantage to the randomness for the consumer that couldn't be done by allowing the consumer to pick exactly what they want at the initial purchase while allowing the consumer just as wide a range of selection as randomness may. They're doing it to make more money by selling people what they <strong>don't</strong> want. And then saying they're doing it to make the person who buys it on the 2nd market happy when they could simply make that person happy by selling the product on the 1st market to begin with.</p><p></p><p>Course, I don't play magic either <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 826783, member: 5724"] I thought about it for a while and I can see the merit of your point guys, more than any other point brought up so far. But there's a catch to it that you might not have thought about. Most people don't want a digester so when they get it they still don't want it. So they sell it on the secondary market to someone who does. ie. WotC is going to make [b]more[/b] of a product (digester mini's in this example) that the majority of people [b]don't[/b] want and they're going to sell it sight-unseen to people who don't want it. That's not a selling point for me. Why not just make the mini's that are less in demand "order from our website only" or some other form of direct delivery that reduces the main expense of the product: distribution? There is no advantage to the randomness for the consumer that couldn't be done by allowing the consumer to pick exactly what they want at the initial purchase while allowing the consumer just as wide a range of selection as randomness may. They're doing it to make more money by selling people what they [b]don't[/b] want. And then saying they're doing it to make the person who buys it on the 2nd market happy when they could simply make that person happy by selling the product on the 1st market to begin with. Course, I don't play magic either :) joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worried about new minis?
Top