Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 742969" data-attributes="member: 786">*SIGH* One more time....All right let me try one final time :I am NOT trying to question the existence of, or justify the mere occurence of, high-level commoners.Those of you who have been replying along the lines of "a high-level commoner == crusty old coot" are completely missing my point.Which is this :In a community where the most experienced adventuring class (you know, the ones who *take* most of the risks) is 5th, how does a stay-at-home commoner achieve over twice the experience levels? In a world where the highest level adventurer is 20th, how can you support epic-level commoners?I could (and do) support the existence of high-level commoners in parity (or a little bit less) than their adventuring peers, but in excess? In a community with an adventurer cap of 5th, I'd expect my commoners to top out around 4-6. And if I've got a hard cap of 20, then *#$%#$%*  I shouldn't be seeing 21st level *anything*, much less 21st level *commoners*.Bingo! You got it! In fact, I've already bought "Magical Medieval Society", though I haven't read through all of it yet. ~140 pages. Whoosh! In fact, as soon as I heard about it, I knew "IT MUST BE MINE!"So far I haven't been disappointed.</blockquote>