Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worst 3.5 publishers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 1294931" data-attributes="member: 10177"><p>Obviously i have a much more demanding opinion of what the definition of compatible and revison mean. Can you play a 3.5 game with only 3.0 books? No. There are so many changes you have to have the 3.5 material available to you in order to play.</p><p></p><p>I know i can integrate this material. I know it is relatively easy to do, i have been doing it with various products for over 19 years now. However, it is my opinion that the changes were not done in a targeted fashion, or even for a better game. It was done to resell the same product to the same consumer. </p><p></p><p>Obviously you would rather call me an avid 3.5 hater. If you would read my post(s) with a less biased view point you would notice I never write that 3.5 sucks or that it is a bad thing to buy. I write that I will not buy it. I write why I will not buy it. Do I think others should not buy 3.5? Yes, but only to show WOTC that the average gamer is not willing to buy a lie. However, I am in the minority about 3.5 being a lie. Fine, it is not the first time my standards have been different from the majority and it won't be the last.</p><p></p><p>The only thing I said I hate is liars. WOTC has met my criteria for being a liar, 3.5, as a game, has not. 3.5 is what it is, and it is useable. I have even said I use the class re-writes from it. So I am obviously not a hater of 3.5, I am a hater of how it was presented and marketed. So I do the only meaningful thing I can do. I refuse to buy 3.5 when WOTC would receive profit from it. Simple as that.</p><p></p><p>edit:</p><p>Sorry, but when I write about such contentious things I refuse to use specific names. I trust those who read this to figure out if what I say is in response to anything you have written to me. And to realize I am not trying to insult you. If you think I have insulted you please wait a little while and then re-read it again, to see if you can correctly understand what i have written. If you still think i have insulted you quote it and ask me to rephrase it in a way you won't find it insulting. You should also be able to e-mail me, if you prefer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 1294931, member: 10177"] Obviously i have a much more demanding opinion of what the definition of compatible and revison mean. Can you play a 3.5 game with only 3.0 books? No. There are so many changes you have to have the 3.5 material available to you in order to play. I know i can integrate this material. I know it is relatively easy to do, i have been doing it with various products for over 19 years now. However, it is my opinion that the changes were not done in a targeted fashion, or even for a better game. It was done to resell the same product to the same consumer. Obviously you would rather call me an avid 3.5 hater. If you would read my post(s) with a less biased view point you would notice I never write that 3.5 sucks or that it is a bad thing to buy. I write that I will not buy it. I write why I will not buy it. Do I think others should not buy 3.5? Yes, but only to show WOTC that the average gamer is not willing to buy a lie. However, I am in the minority about 3.5 being a lie. Fine, it is not the first time my standards have been different from the majority and it won't be the last. The only thing I said I hate is liars. WOTC has met my criteria for being a liar, 3.5, as a game, has not. 3.5 is what it is, and it is useable. I have even said I use the class re-writes from it. So I am obviously not a hater of 3.5, I am a hater of how it was presented and marketed. So I do the only meaningful thing I can do. I refuse to buy 3.5 when WOTC would receive profit from it. Simple as that. edit: Sorry, but when I write about such contentious things I refuse to use specific names. I trust those who read this to figure out if what I say is in response to anything you have written to me. And to realize I am not trying to insult you. If you think I have insulted you please wait a little while and then re-read it again, to see if you can correctly understand what i have written. If you still think i have insulted you quote it and ask me to rephrase it in a way you won't find it insulting. You should also be able to e-mail me, if you prefer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Worst 3.5 publishers?
Top