Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dakkareth" data-source="post: 2648060" data-attributes="member: 9928">My knowledge of the kind of physics involved comes from popular science books (Michio Kaku et al), so this may be totally wrong, but ...They have more consistent theories now, that explicitely disallow this? To my knowledge (which is admittedly not quite up-to-date) all this rotating-black hole, Einstein-Rosen-Bridge, etc stuff always was a big Maybe - mathematically possible under certain conditions, which may or may not fit this universe. And now they have found *evidence* of one and found out it didn't work?&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid&nbsp; &nbsp; :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> I don't think that was an assumption, ever. More of a considered possibility. And they didn't have such theories?That said, I haven't even seen the movie. And if someone knows better than I do, as I'm sure someone will, please enlighten me ...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dakkareth, post: 2648060, member: 9928"] My knowledge of the kind of physics involved comes from popular science books (Michio Kaku et al), so this may be totally wrong, but ... They have more consistent theories now, that explicitely disallow this? To my knowledge (which is admittedly not quite up-to-date) all this rotating-black hole, Einstein-Rosen-Bridge, etc stuff always was a big Maybe - mathematically possible under certain conditions, which may or may not fit this universe. And now they have found *evidence* of one and found out it didn't work? :uhoh: I don't think that was an assumption, ever. More of a considered possibility. And they didn't have such theories? That said, I haven't even seen the movie. And if someone knows better than I do, as I'm sure someone will, please enlighten me ... [/QUOTE]

Verification