Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
WotBS (conversion to Pathfinder) OOC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dragonwriter" data-source="post: 5301812" data-attributes="member: 54988"><p>There's a reason they sound like each other... They are each other. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>3.5 PHB/SRD also says: A spell-like ability has no verbal, somatic, or material component, nor does it require a focus or have an XP cost.</p><p><a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/specialAbilities.htm#specialAbilities" target="_blank">3.5 SRD Special Abilities</a></p><p><a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic#TOC-Special-Abilities" target="_blank">Pathfinder SRD Special Abilities</a></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>That's all well and good by me. Extraordinary abilities are non-magical, anyway, like Improved Grab for a Dire Ape or Trip for a Wolf.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I feel the need to point out any Dragon's Breath Weapon. All are Su, but the only action is breathing, and none can be dispelled. Antimagic Field negates them, but that is rather high-power.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Then would the SLA take Arcane Spell Failure chance? Would an SLA-user have to use material components? The rules say they have no components, so why can't they just have no components (says this in PF and 3.5)? I can see justification in getting AoO'd because you have to focus on it, like on a spell. Your focus is elsewhere, your opponents take a swing at you while you are open. I don't mind that. </p><p>Supernatural abilities don't face that because they don't take focus, they are second nature.</p><p></p><p>I mean, it was balanced enough in 3.5 that they left it as such in PF. Why can't we just leave it as is, as it doesn't <em>need</em> to be HR'd. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, as the saying goes. </p><p></p><p>Components, also, are only backed up by the Vancian casting system, and remain largely a flavor point. I have never bothered with typing or saying some kind of incantation in play, and I doubt I ever will. And the Metamagic feats Still/Silent Spell negate the need for them anyway. And neither of those feats say they negate any AoO.</p><p></p><p>As I see it, the AoO is for being focused on something other than the guy standing in front of you, waving a sword at you. If you can make the Concentration check, you keep your focus, don't get smacked, and keep the spell. If you get smacked or are too focused on dodging the guy, you lose the spell/SLA.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to say it again: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Please, HM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dragonwriter, post: 5301812, member: 54988"] There's a reason they sound like each other... They are each other. ;) 3.5 PHB/SRD also says: A spell-like ability has no verbal, somatic, or material component, nor does it require a focus or have an XP cost. [url=http://www.d20srd.org/srd/specialAbilities.htm#specialAbilities]3.5 SRD Special Abilities[/url] [url=http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic#TOC-Special-Abilities]Pathfinder SRD Special Abilities[/url] That's all well and good by me. Extraordinary abilities are non-magical, anyway, like Improved Grab for a Dire Ape or Trip for a Wolf. I feel the need to point out any Dragon's Breath Weapon. All are Su, but the only action is breathing, and none can be dispelled. Antimagic Field negates them, but that is rather high-power. Then would the SLA take Arcane Spell Failure chance? Would an SLA-user have to use material components? The rules say they have no components, so why can't they just have no components (says this in PF and 3.5)? I can see justification in getting AoO'd because you have to focus on it, like on a spell. Your focus is elsewhere, your opponents take a swing at you while you are open. I don't mind that. Supernatural abilities don't face that because they don't take focus, they are second nature. I mean, it was balanced enough in 3.5 that they left it as such in PF. Why can't we just leave it as is, as it doesn't [i]need[/i] to be HR'd. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, as the saying goes. Components, also, are only backed up by the Vancian casting system, and remain largely a flavor point. I have never bothered with typing or saying some kind of incantation in play, and I doubt I ever will. And the Metamagic feats Still/Silent Spell negate the need for them anyway. And neither of those feats say they negate any AoO. As I see it, the AoO is for being focused on something other than the guy standing in front of you, waving a sword at you. If you can make the Concentration check, you keep your focus, don't get smacked, and keep the spell. If you get smacked or are too focused on dodging the guy, you lose the spell/SLA. I'm going to say it again: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Please, HM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
WotBS (conversion to Pathfinder) OOC
Top