Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="justanobody" data-source="post: 4543645" data-attributes="member: 70778">It doesn't. It realtes to the tiles being 1 inch and the minis being random scale, and that throughout the &quot;for use with all editions of D&amp;D&quot; there is not even a standard scale.Oddsa re if you use minis instead of M&amp;Ms and Cheetos for visual representations of PCs/monsters/etc, you are more interested in things being at least close to scale. wherein someone using Epic 40k minis in a regular 40k game wouldn't be silly at all would it?So having a 2 foot tall barrel as tall as the 6 foot tall paladin seems to break up things for those that DO like some sort of consistency.If you don't care about anything, then you probably don't use minis and don't care to spend money on them, or don't care for the ext5ra paint steps or grid lines on the tiles.Those that do are the reason the tiles have grid lines, the reason care is being taken to give non-random minis to RPGers, and the reason the number of deco-ops are being increased to give better quality.Maybe even those that do care, being the prime mini market are the reason for the change in not only DDM, but something from future tiles as well.I didn't touch on Scott's remark about 2d v 3d because the tiles by WotC don't claim to be terrain that I have noticed yet.Not being the DM, I haven't really paid attention to the packaging that much anyway, so it might be on it, but nothing to call Scott into just because he mentioned our side discussion, wherein the scale means more than just terrain but the minis and tiles and its important to them.The tiles need to follow scale of some sort since those 1 inch grid squares are 1&quot;=5' now right? Even if there is no minis game they need to support.So that means the artwork depicting terrain upon them needs to conform to that scale. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I was being facetious.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="justanobody, post: 4543645, member: 70778"] It doesn't. It realtes to the tiles being 1 inch and the minis being random scale, and that throughout the "for use with all editions of D&D" there is not even a standard scale. Oddsa re if you use minis instead of M&Ms and Cheetos for visual representations of PCs/monsters/etc, you are more interested in things being at least close to scale. wherein someone using Epic 40k minis in a regular 40k game wouldn't be silly at all would it? So having a 2 foot tall barrel as tall as the 6 foot tall paladin seems to break up things for those that DO like some sort of consistency. If you don't care about anything, then you probably don't use minis and don't care to spend money on them, or don't care for the ext5ra paint steps or grid lines on the tiles. Those that do are the reason the tiles have grid lines, the reason care is being taken to give non-random minis to RPGers, and the reason the number of deco-ops are being increased to give better quality. Maybe even those that do care, being the prime mini market are the reason for the change in not only DDM, but something from future tiles as well. I didn't touch on Scott's remark about 2d v 3d because the tiles by WotC don't claim to be terrain that I have noticed yet. Not being the DM, I haven't really paid attention to the packaging that much anyway, so it might be on it, but nothing to call Scott into just because he mentioned our side discussion, wherein the scale means more than just terrain but the minis and tiles and its important to them. The tiles need to follow scale of some sort since those 1 inch grid squares are 1"=5' now right? Even if there is no minis game they need to support. So that means the artwork depicting terrain upon them needs to conform to that scale. ;) I was being facetious. [/QUOTE]

Verification