Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 3647742" data-attributes="member: 10479">I may have explained that poorly.&nbsp; Allow me a second chance.&nbsp; This -<a href="http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif</a>- is 300 pixels wide and the WotC header banner (flash or not, which is butting up against the EN logo gif) is 728 x 90.300 + 728 - 1028- which is a bit wider than my 1024 browser setting causing my need to scroll left and right.&nbsp; My suggestion is that this -<a href="http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif</a>- really doesn't seem to need to be 300 wide and if reduced to 250 would not actually cut into the logo, proper, but just the (transparent) background.No?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark CMG, post: 3647742, member: 10479"] I may have explained that poorly. Allow me a second chance. This - [url]http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif[/url] - is 300 pixels wide and the WotC header banner (flash or not, which is butting up against the EN logo gif) is 728 x 90. 300 + 728 - 1028 - which is a bit wider than my 1024 browser setting causing my need to scroll left and right. My suggestion is that this - [url]http://www.enworld.org/images/anniversary/misc/banner/default.gif[/url] - really doesn't seem to need to be 300 wide and if reduced to 250 would not actually cut into the logo, proper, but just the (transparent) background. No? [/QUOTE]

Verification